“…‘Ownership’ is based on the respondents' perceptions of whether they own the land and does not distinguish between whether or not they have a bundle of rights [access, withdrawal, management, exclusions and alienation (Quisumbing et al, 2015)] to the land. - Nutritional outcomes:
- – Maternal dietary diversity score as a count out of 10 food groups consumed by female caregivers aged 15–49 years, calculated using the Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women (MDD‐W; FAO, 2014)
- ‐BMI (kg/m 2 ) of non‐pregnant, non‐post‐partum female caregivers aged 15–49 years
- Hypothesised agricultural and women's empowerment mediators:
- ‐Value of agriculture production: ln‐value of total agricultural production in the last three agricultural seasons (in the last 12 months), in 1,000 Indian Rupees. Production from all cultivated land (owned, rented, shared or other arrangements such cultivating on an extend family member's land or community land) included.
- ‐Agriculture production diversity: Count of 10 food groups produced, regardless of land ownership status, in the last three agricultural seasons (in the last 12 months) by households in any quantity.
- ‐Women's decision‐making: Women's self‐reported involvement (to at least some extent of involvement) in ≥2 versus <2 productive decisions in the household, out of four possible decisions (Malapit et al, 2015)
- ‐Women's group participation: Women's self‐reported active participation in any community groups (Malapit, Kovarik, et al, 2015)
- ‐Women's time use: Amount of work‐free time that women have (<10.5 vs. ≥10.5 h of work) based on a 24‐h time‐use recall (Malapit, Kovarik, et al, 2015)
- ‐Women's land ownership: Women's self‐reported land ownership, in two categories: none versus any (joint or sole) ownership.
In addition to the variables of interest on the pathway from land to maternal nutrition, we also used the following variables that we identified well known a priori as confounders: caste group (Coelho & Belden, 2016), years of maternal education (Subramanian & Smith, 2006), count of household assets (Subramanian & Smith, 2006), household size (Rashid, Smith, & Rahman, 2011), female‐only households (Rashid et al, 2011) and maternal age ( Harris‐Fry et al, 2015). The asset score includes the following 15 assets: high cost consumer durables, low cost consumer durables, jewellery, mobile phone, electricity, computer, internet, motorbike, mechanised agricultural assets, business assets, high‐quality fuel type, finished flooring, finished roofing, finished walls and toilet.…”