A systematic review of the burden of hypertension, access to services and patient views of hypertension in humanitarian crisis settings

Abstract

IntroductionGlobally, a record number of people are affected by humanitarian crises caused by conflict and natural disasters. Many such populations live in settings where epidemiological transition is underway. Following the United Nations high level meeting on non-communicable diseases, the global commitment to Universal Health Coverage and needs expressed by humanitarian agencies, there is increasing effort to develop guidelines for the management of hypertension in humanitarian settings. The objective was to investigate the prevalence and incidence of hypertension in populations directly affected by humanitarian crises; the cascade of care in these populations and patient knowledge of and attitude to hypertension.MethodsA literature search was carried out in five databases. Grey literature was searched. The population of interest was adult, non-pregnant, civilians living in any country who were directly exposed to a crisis since 1999. Eligibility assessment, data extraction and quality appraisal were carried out in duplicate.ResultsSixty-one studies were included in the narrative synthesis. They reported on a range of crises including the wars in Syria and Iraq, the Great East Japan Earthquake, Hurricane Katrina and Palestinian refugees. There were few studies from Africa or Asia (excluding Japan). The studies predominantly assessed prevalence of hypertension. This varied with geography and age of the population. Access to care, patient understanding and patient views on hypertension were poorly examined. Most of the studies had a high risk of bias due to methods used in the diagnosis of hypertension and in the selection of study populations.ConclusionHypertension is seen in a range of humanitarian settings and the burden can be considerable. Further studies are needed to accurately estimate prevalence of hypertension in crisis-affected populations throughout the world. An appreciation of patient knowledge and understanding of hypertension as well as the cascade of care would be invaluable in informing service provision.

Understanding the health needs of internally displaced persons: A scoping review

“…When humanitarian programmes provide NCD care, typically only what are known as the ‘big four’ (cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases and cancer) have received attention. Of displaced and crisis-affected populations more broadly (inclusive of refugees), some limited information has been collated on the burden of diabetes and hypertension ( Kehlenbrink et al., 2019 ; Keasley et al., 2020 ). Data for other NCDs such as cancer and neurological conditions is severely lacking in IDP populations.…”

Hibiscus sabdariffa, a Treatment for Uncontrolled Hypertension. Pilot Comparative Intervention

“…People experiencing forced displacement like refugees and internally displaced persons often face a highly stressful situation. That may in itself be a factor of heightened BP; and disrupted supplies of medication are additional factors of poor hypertension control [15]. This might explain why baseline values of BP were so high (above 150 mmHg) despite the fact that a good part of participants was taking anti-hypertensive conventional medication (albeit with unknown adherence).…”

Cross-sectional survey to describe medicine use among Syrian asylum seekers and refugees in a German federal state: looking beyond infectious diseases

“…From a drug utilisation research perspective, it is important to consider both the prevalence of medicine use and the number of doses, as the high number or frequency of medication doses is associated with medication burden among patients. 25 The relative use of medicines is presented by stratifying the total amount of medicines used by the sex and age of the participants and by whether the medicines were prescribed or not. In addition, we report the number of defined daily doses (DDDs) for each medicine.…”