2022
DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2022.2089589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of the effect of running shoes on running economy, performance and biomechanics: analysis by brand and model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the fatigue manifestations are conditioned to the footwear models used. Ruiz-Alias et al [2] highlighted the wide variability that the different footwear categories (i. e., marathon shoes, minimal shoes, maximal shoes) present based on the models compared on RE, performance and biomechanics. Thus, further track spikes and marathon shoes models need to be evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the fatigue manifestations are conditioned to the footwear models used. Ruiz-Alias et al [2] highlighted the wide variability that the different footwear categories (i. e., marathon shoes, minimal shoes, maximal shoes) present based on the models compared on RE, performance and biomechanics. Thus, further track spikes and marathon shoes models need to be evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-distance running performance is mediated by several factors where running economy (RE) among others plays a major role [1]. Different footwear categories (e. g., marathon shoes, minimal shoes) have shown to have a large influence on it, but their effect over the course of a long-distance might fluctuate due to different fatigue evolutions [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, Fuller et al [33] determined after performing a systematic review of the effect of footwear on running performance and running economy that the former had not been investigated yet. In 2022, although a growing interest emerged, Ruiz-Alias et al [34] highlighted that the lack of studies was still present. Although different limitations are inherent to performance measures (e.g., athlete involvement) [35], meaningful changes in performance derived from footwear can be discerned through the appropriate methodology and statistical analysis.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that IFC is related not only to initial foot positioning and subsequent ankle and foot kinematics but also to Well-trained Endurance Runners' Foot Contact Patterns: Barefoot vs. Shod Condition more global running kinematics, such as CT, knee flexion and leg stiffness [4]. Moreover, athlete's level, training level, running distance, stride frequency, running speed, substrate mechanical properties [5,6] and shoe features (i. e. minimalist -those that mimic barefoot running, are highly flexible, lightweight and have a low heel-to-toe drop-vs. traditional running shoes) [7][8][9][10], may also affect IFC and running performance. Previous research consistently demonstrated that the majority of recreational and novice shod runners present RFS (ranging from ~77 % up to 97 %) when running long distances [3,7,[11][12][13][14][15][16], maybe influenced by the high-heeled and cushioned modern running shoes (RS) [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%