2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80125-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of the antifungal effectiveness and tolerability of amphotericin B formulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, amphotericin B has been used in the clinic and is still regarded as a golden standard and a life-saving drug in the treatment of many severe fungal infections (1)(2)(3). However, the medical application of AmB is limited by its toxicity and poor solubility, necessitating hospitalization and parenteral administration (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, amphotericin B has been used in the clinic and is still regarded as a golden standard and a life-saving drug in the treatment of many severe fungal infections (1)(2)(3). However, the medical application of AmB is limited by its toxicity and poor solubility, necessitating hospitalization and parenteral administration (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognosis in neutropenic patients is especially poor, with a fatality rate of 56% to 100% (16,23,24,29,31). To date, the antifungal of choice has been amphotericin B at the highest tolerable doses (3,12,36). Because morbidity and mortality remain high, especially in immunocompromised patients, new and better treatments are needed to reduce death and disfigurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NNT value of eight indicates that if eight patients are treated with voriconazole instead of CAB, one additional death will be averted within a 12-week timeframe. For comparison, a recent meta-analysis of the antifungal effectiveness and tolerability of amphotericin B formulations in the treatment of systemic fungal infections estimated that, overall, 31 patients need to be treated with lipid formulations of amphotericin B instead of CAB in order to prevent one death (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a meta-analysis of all lipid formulations in comparison with CAB for systemic fungal infections demonstrated a significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality, no significant difference in treatment success rate between the lipid formulations and CAB was found (10). Itraconazole, an azole antifungal agent, has similar efficacy as CAB when administered orally (11), and guidelines recommend oral itraconazole as follow-up therapy after initial treatment with CAB (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%