A systematic review of the use of quality-of-life instruments in randomized controlled trials for psoriasis

Abstract

Planners of interventional studies in psoriasis face the dilemma of selecting suitable quality-of-life (QoL) measures. Systematic reviews have the potential of identifying psychometrically sound measures in a given therapeutic area, while guiding the development of practice guidelines. The aim of this systematic review was to generate evidence of the use of QoL instruments in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for interventions in psoriasis. The methodology followed the PRISMA guidelines. Six databases were searched with 388 search terms. Abstracts of articles were reviewed independently by two assessors, and a third adjudicator resolved any opinion differences. Risk of bias was assessed using the Jadad scale. Of 3646 screened publications, 99 articles (100 trials) met the eligibility criteria for inclusion, describing research on 33 215 patients. Thirty-three trials tested topical therapy, 18 systemic, 39 biologics, nine phototherapy and 10 other interventions. The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was the most commonly used QoL instrument (83 studies, 83%), followed by the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) (31, 31%), EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) (15, 15%), Psoriasis Disability Index (14, 14%) and Skindex (five, 5%). There was widespread inconsistency in the way that QoL data were reported. Of the 100 trials identified, 37 reported minimal clinically important difference (MCID): 32 for DLQI, 10 for SF-36 and six for EQ-5D. QoL measurement is increasingly being reported in RCTs of psoriasis. Formal guidelines are needed for assessment and publishing of QoL data. Researchers should consider whether MCID information is available, and development of MCID data should be encouraged.

A detailed analysis of ‘not relevant’ responses on the DLQI in psoriasis: potential biases in treatment decisions

“…It serves as an easy‐to‐use instrument and a useful benchmark to evaluate treatment efficacy both in routine clinical work and in a variety of researches . It is by far the most commonly applied HRQoL tool in randomized controlled trials for interventions in psoriasis . According to the European consensus, DLQI is among the diagnostic criteria of moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis to determine which patients need to be offered systemic treatments .…”

Differential effects of secukinumab vs. ustekinumab for treatment of psoriasis on quality of life, work productivity and activity impairment: a structural equation modelling analysis

“…However, although PASI provides a composite assessment of the signs and extent of psoriasis, it does not yield information about the effect psoriasis has on patients’ lives . The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is the most commonly used instrument to assess the health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with psoriasis . However, increasing evidence confirms only weak to moderate correlations between the PASI and DLQI .…”

Using a novel scoring system for paronychia related to oncologic treatments (SPOT) for assessing paronychia severity and its correlation with pain index and quality of life

“…The DLQI is the most commonly used QoL instrument in randomized controlled trials of psoriasis . It has been shown to correlate with patients’ psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) change during the treatments and thus is now considered to be a triage tool for psoriasis management strategies in the UK .…”