2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of the experimental studies on the effectiveness of mixed reality in higher education between 2017 and 2021

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that PowerPoint instruction was more effective than HoloLens instruction for teaching the human muscular system was contrary to our hypothesis, and to previous studies that suggested MR technology could enhance learning outcomes in various domains [28,29]. One possible explanation for this result is that the HoloLens device imposed a higher cognitive load on learners than the PowerPoint presentation, as they had to process more information and interact with more features in the MR environment.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Findingscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding that PowerPoint instruction was more effective than HoloLens instruction for teaching the human muscular system was contrary to our hypothesis, and to previous studies that suggested MR technology could enhance learning outcomes in various domains [28,29]. One possible explanation for this result is that the HoloLens device imposed a higher cognitive load on learners than the PowerPoint presentation, as they had to process more information and interact with more features in the MR environment.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Findingscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Odame and Tümler [28] found that using off-the-shelf VR software (namely Sharecare YOU VR) to teach the anatomy of the human heart was more effective and satisfying than a conventional teaching method. Similarly, Banjar et al [29] reviewed 12 experimental studies of the use of mixed reality in higher education, and found that most focused on 3D manipulation, visualization, and understanding of 3D object layers and components, especially in the medical and health sciences. The use of VR/AR/MR also presents opportunities and some challenges for instructional design, including the fact these technologies may impose different cognitive demands and preferences on learners and instructors.…”
Section: Immersive Technologies In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the CIPP Evaluation Model is to provide a comprehensive evaluation format for understanding activities from the emergence of ideas or concepts to the results achieved (Muhadjir & Nugroho, 2011). With its comprehensive and systematic nature, this evaluation model is widely used for research due to its effectiveness and achievement of evaluated objects (Hakan & Seval, 2011); (Yang et al, 2024); (Banjar et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR technology, with its immersive and interactive capabilities, stands as an educational innovation [24,25], offering a stark contrast to the passive learning modes associated with traditional tools like PowerPoint presentations [26,27]. The integration of MR in education promises a more dynamic and engaging learning environment, where students can interact with complex concepts in a three-dimensional space, fostering deeper understanding and retention [9,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%