2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2014.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of the Space technology transfer literature: Research synthesis and emerging gaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusions presented in this article are the result of a 3-step analysis process (Venturini and Verbano, 2014) comprising:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusions presented in this article are the result of a 3-step analysis process (Venturini and Verbano, 2014) comprising:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64 However, in the post-Cold-War era, these policies predominantly revolve around the power of innovation. 13,14 In particular, on one hand, the discourse is built on the expectations of technology transfer from publicly funded basic and applied science, [65][66][67] and on the other hand, the creation of new markets for the Space Sector applications [68][69][70][71] as part of economic (development) policy. Hence, the Space Sector's growth is being supported by deliberate top-down policy interventions, often delivered dispersedly by publicly backed innovation intermediaries, while it also relies upon a preexisting environment and bottom-up entrepreneurial action, that is, the Open Innovation approach.…”
Section: Industry Transition and Emergence Of ''New Space''mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily, public agencies are investing in a series of initiatives to ensure that such knowledge ''spillovers'' from (academic) research 126,127 reach the market via ''knowledge intermediaries,'' which is currently the subject of a broad consensus in the field of science and innovation policy internationally 128,129 and in the Space Sector in particular. 65,66,130 These ideas have been adopted at both the U.K.-wide level as well as within the specific regional (Scottish) context, with divergent implementation.…”
Section: From Policy To Action: the Scottish Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, more board lessons can be learned applicable in many other high-tech contexts. Of particular concern is the current lack of clarity as to the various roles and actions performed by the innovation intermediaries [80] and the contextualised sectoral needs [81,82]. Hence, in order for Agile Space Living Lab innovation model to be understood and developed further, analysis of the roles and activities of innovation intermediaries is needed.…”
Section: Analysing Policy: Innovation Intermediaries and Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%