A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies

Abstract

BackgroundLongitudinal studies are of aetiological and public health relevance but can be undermined by attrition. The aim of this paper was to identify effective retention strategies to increase participation in population-based cohort studies.MethodsSystematic review of the literature to identify prospective population-based cohort studies with health outcomes in which retention strategies had been evaluated.ResultsTwenty-eight studies published up to January 2011 were included. Eleven of which were randomized controlled trials of retention strategies (RCT). Fifty-seven percent of the studies were postal, 21% in-person, 14% telephone and 7% had mixed data collection methods. A total of 45 different retention strategies were used, categorised as 1) incentives, 2) reminder methods, repeat visits or repeat questionnaires, alternative modes of data collection or 3) other methods. Incentives were associated with an increase in retention rates, which improved with greater incentive value. Whether cash was the most effective incentive was not clear from studies that compared cash and gifts of similar value. The average increase in retention rate was 12% for reminder letters, 5% for reminder calls and 12% for repeat questionnaires. Ten studies used alternative data collection methods, mainly as a last resort. All postal studies offered telephone interviews to non-responders, which increased retention rates by 3%. Studies that used face-to-face interviews increased their retention rates by 24% by offering alternative locations and modes of data collection.ConclusionsIncentives boosted retention rates in prospective cohort studies. Other methods appeared to have a beneficial effect but there was a general lack of a systematic approach to their evaluation.

Alcohol and disadvantaged men: A feasibility trial of an intervention delivered by mobile phone

“…Mobile phone‐delivered interventions that tackle adverse health behaviours typically have retention rates of 70–90% 26, 27, 29, so the present study ranks among the highest. This may have been because of the use of evidence‐based retention techniques, particularly the use of financial incentives 61, 68, 69.…”

HIV/AIDS: Risk & protective behaviors among adults ages 21 to 40 in the U.S., 2004-2016

“…Virtually all longitudinal studies-including MTF-experience attrition, which is often differential with respect to health risks including substance use (e.g., Booker et al, 2011;Brook et al, 2009;Galea & Tracy, 2007;McCabe & West, 2015;McGuigan et al, 1997). In addition, survey response rates in general have been declining over the past few decades (e.g.,MTF questionnaires sent each year (roughly 18,000) across the entire coterminous U.S., we have viewed low-cost mail surveys as our best cost-effective option, although we are now evaluating the use of web-based data collection as an alternative, using an experimental design.…”

Clinical trial metadata: defining and extracting metadata on the design, conduct, results and costs of 125 randomised clinical trials funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme

“…Booker et al 70 considered retention in long-term prospective cohort studies, which tend to be more vulnerable to attrition than most clinical trials. Their systematic review considered 28 studies, of which 11 were randomised trials of retention strategies.…”