A Systematic Review of the Economic Evaluation of Telemedicine in Japan

Abstract

Objectives:There is no systematic review on economic evaluations of telemedicine in Japan, despite over 1000 trials implemented. Our systematic review aims to examine whether Japan’s telemedicine is cost-saving or cost-effective, examine the methodological rigorousness of the economic evaluations, and discuss future studies needed to improve telemedicine’s financial sustainability.Methods:We searched five databases, including two Japanese databases, to find peer-reviewed articles published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2014 in English and Japanese that performed economic evaluations of Japan’s telemedicine programs. The methodological rigorousness of the economic analyses was assessed with a well-established checklist. We calculated the benefit-to-cost ratio (BCR) when a reviewed study reported related data but did not report the BCR. All cost values were adjusted to 2014 US dollars.Results:Among the 17 articles identified, six studies reported on settings connecting physicians for specialist consultations, and eleven studies on settings connecting healthcare providers and patients at home. There are three cost-benefit analyses and three cost-minimization analyses. The remaining studies measured the benefit of telemedicine only, using medical expenditure saved or users’ willingness-to-pay. There was substantial diversity in the methodological rigorousness. Studies on teledermatology and teleradiology indicated a favorable level of economic efficiency. Studies on telehomecare gave mixed results. One cost-benefit analysis on telehomecare indicated a low economic efficiency, partly due to public subsidy rules, e.g., a too short budget period.Conclusions:Overall, telemedicine programs in Japan were indicated to have a favorable level of economic efficiency. However, the scarcity of the economic literature indicates the need for further rigorous economic evaluation studies.

Telemedicine in the OECD: An umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation

“…In Japan, remote monitoring and video consultations were found to be generally cost-effective for teledermatology and teleradiology from a provider or societal perspective. However tele-homecare produced mixed results due to lower willingness to pay and higher system costs in areas with public subsidies, which led to overutilization [ 63 ]. In one high-quality review, 74% of included studies found that remote monitoring through mobile devices to support data collection was cost-effective, economically beneficial, or cost saving at base case from a provider or societal perspective [ 64 ].…”

Understanding Medical Students’ Attitudes Toward Learning eHealth: Questionnaire Study

“…eHealth has been proven to be effective in clinical practice [ 1 - 13 , 29 , 30 ]; however, eHealth has not yet been implemented into the working standards of many doctors [ 31 - 33 ]. Prior research indicates that training and education for all those involved with implementation and the use of eHealth is a key factor for the successful incorporation of eHealth [ 13 - 16 , 30 ]. There are various obstacles to implementing eHealth into clinical practice.…”

“…A review of 58 systematic reviews showed that overall eHealth provides beneficial results in a wide variety of medical applications [ 12 ]. These developments improve the quality of care or maintain the current standard and reduce health care costs [ 13 - 15 ]. These studies indicate that eHealth would allow for a change clinical practice for the better by using technology.…”

Gerenciamento do Enfermeiro em e-Saúde e a articulação dos princí­pios da Atenção Primária em Saúde e Saúde Suplementar: Relato de Experiência durante o iní­cio da Pandemia Covid-19

“…A utilização da telessaúde perpassa o empoderamento de cada indivíduo e pode ser capaz de reorganizar os sistemas de saúde em monitoramento (16) , eficiência econômica de valor e experiência do indivíduo (17)(18)(19) .…”