2008
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of topical negative pressure therapy for acute and chronic wounds

Abstract: There is little evidence to support the use of TNP in the treatment of wounds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
103
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…When testing differences between means we used a Shapiro-Wilk test for the normality of the two distributions followed by an independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. A Chi-square test 8 or Fisher's exact test was used for proportions. The differences in mean costs and outcomes between the two arms were used to estimate the ICER.…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When testing differences between means we used a Shapiro-Wilk test for the normality of the two distributions followed by an independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. A Chi-square test 8 or Fisher's exact test was used for proportions. The differences in mean costs and outcomes between the two arms were used to estimate the ICER.…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of reviews of NPWT [4][5][6][7][8] , with some favouring NPWT over standard dressings [5,6] and others failing to find convincing evidence of benefit [4,7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the whole, current study data do not allow for conclusions on a significant advantage of a certain wound dressing in the healing rate of diabetic or venous ulcers [15,76,78,79,81,87,88]. …”
Section: Moisture Balancementioning
confidence: 88%
“…With regard to the case described above, it is probable that conventional dressings would have been unlikely to have successfully maintained an environment conducive to healing, considering the presence of a purulent fistula in contact with the prosthetic arterial graft and the large areas of dehiscence. Systematic reviews 8,9 and a randomized study 10 show the effectiveness of negative pressure dressings in a range of situations, in terms both of the proportion of wounds healed and the speed with which they close, and they are particularly effective for diabetic feet, [11][12][13] skin grafts 14 and infections after surgery. 15,16 However, there is still a lack of good quality randomized studies free from conflicts of interest that would allow the method to be evaluated more thoroughly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%