2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-017-0528-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of undisplaced femoral neck fracture treatments for patients over 65 years of age, with a focus on union rates and avascular necrosis

Abstract: BackgroundIt remains unclear whether conservative treatment should be used to treat the common undisplaced femoral neck fractures that develop in the elderly. Herein, we systematically review the rates of union and avascular necrosis after conservative and surgical treatment of undisplaced femoral neck fractures.MethodsWe searched the EMBASE, PubMed, OVID, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for randomized controlled trials or observational studies that assessed the outcomes of conservative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
57
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
57
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This protocol nowadays is used to induce constant osteoporosis, similar to our study. We found noticeable decrease in TBA between healthy rabbits and the experimental ones: the mean TBA in healthy rabbits was 0.393 mm 2 , and in operated animals it was from 0.206 mm 2 to 0.242 mm 2 , which is a 38-48% decrease. Our findings suggest that the established level of osteoporosis inducing bone remodeling changes was severe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This protocol nowadays is used to induce constant osteoporosis, similar to our study. We found noticeable decrease in TBA between healthy rabbits and the experimental ones: the mean TBA in healthy rabbits was 0.393 mm 2 , and in operated animals it was from 0.206 mm 2 to 0.242 mm 2 , which is a 38-48% decrease. Our findings suggest that the established level of osteoporosis inducing bone remodeling changes was severe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Osteoporosis is defined as a generalized skeletal disease with micro architectural bone changes and low mineral density, which leads to fragility and risk of fractures [1]. In the field of orthopedics, an osteoporotic femoral neck fracture is one of the most common and devastating injuries and, despite correct surgical fixation, avascular necrosis or metal implant dislocations can occur in up to 22.5% of bone surgery cases [2]. To overcome those complications, many attempts have been made to improve bone healing and mechanical stability of the prosthesis by creating physiologically active implant induced bone remodeling [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden III/IV), the use of joint replacement surgery has basically reached consensus, but it has large trauma, high price, many early complications, and a high risk of surgery [2]. However, the treatment of elderly non-displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden I/II) is still controversial [3]. Given that non-surgical treatment of fractures is prone to re-displacement, the re-displacement is as high as 33-44%, and the fracture healing rate is only 44.38% [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the treatment of elderly non-displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden I/II) is still controversial [3]. Given that non-surgical treatment of fractures is prone to re-displacement, the re-displacement is as high as 33-44%, and the fracture healing rate is only 44.38% [3]. At present, elderly patients with non-displaced femoral neck fractures tend to be surgically treated [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main complications of arthroplasty are periprosthetic dislocation, infection, and revision surgery, which potentially impact morbidity and quality of life and may contribute to mortality [3]. The treatment of elderly non-displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden I/II) is still controversial [4]. Given that non-surgical treatment of fractures is prone to re-displacement, the redisplacement is as high as 33% to 44%, and the fracture healing rate is only 44.38% [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%