A systematic review on academic research productivity of postgraduate students in low- and middle-income countries

Abstract

BackgroundWhile several individual studies addressing research productivity of post-graduate students are available, a synthesis of effective strategies to increase productivity and the determinants of productivity in low-income countries has not been undertaken. Further, whether or not this research from post-graduate students’ projects was applied in evidence-informed decision-making was unknown. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of literature to identify and assess the effectiveness of approaches that increase productivity (proportion published) or the application (proportion cited) of post-graduate students’ research, as well as to assess the determinants of post-graduate students’ research productivity and use.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review as per our a priori published protocol, also registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016042819). We searched for published articles in PubMed/MEDLINE and the ERIC databases through to July 2017. We performed duplicate assessments for included primary studies and resolved discrepancies by consensus. Thereafter, we completed a structured narrative synthesis and, for a subset of studies, we performed a meta-analysis of the findings using both fixed and random effects approaches. We aligned our results to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.ResultsWe found 5080 articles in the PubMed (n = 3848) and ERIC (n = 1232) databases. After excluding duplicates (n = 33), we screened 5047 articles, of which 5012 were excluded. We then retrieved 44 full texts and synthesised 14, of which 4 had a high risk of bias. We did not find any studies assessing effectiveness of strategies for increasing publication nor citations of post-graduate research projects. We found an average publication proportion of 7% (95% CI 7–8%, Higgins I-squared 0.0% and Cochran’s Q p < 0.01) and 23% (95% CI 17–29%, Higgins I-squared of 98.4% and Cochran’s Q, p < 0.01) using fixed effects and random effects models, respectively. Two studies reported on the citation of post-graduate students’ studies, at 17% (95% CI 15–19%) in Uganda and a median citation of 1 study in Turkey (IQR 0.6–2.3). Only one included study reported on the determinants of productivity or use of post-graduate students’ research, suggesting that younger students were more likely to publish and cohort studies were more likely to be published.ConclusionsWe report on the low productivity of post-graduate students’ research in low- and middle-income countries, including the citation of post-graduate students’ research in evidence-informed health policy in low- and middle-income countries. Secondly, we did not find a single study that assessed strategies to increase productivity and use of post-graduate students’ research in evidence-informed health policy, a subject for future research.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0360-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A preprogram appraisal of factors influencing research productivity among faculty at college of medicine, University of Lagos

“…Similar studies in Nigeria and other parts of Africa have reported similar levels of RP and are at variance with the research output of academic faculty in HIC who produce more than 97% of the worlds’ research output. [ 10 11 12 13 ] For instance, a study among faculty at the Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Uganda, reported a PRP per capita of 2.1. [ 13 ] These findings have important implications for policy and planning as they highlight the need for university management to intensify efforts to improve RP and output among the researchers at CMUL and other institutions in LMIC in Africa.…”

The value of case reports in democratising evidence from resource-limited settings: results of an exploratory survey

“…Further, our results reinforce the importance of patient-centred research, alongside operational research, for comprehending complex health conditions in developing countries and for improving the quality of care. CRs can play a significant role in identifying subjects that may be needed to link the knowledge gained in the field with policy and practice and inform clinical practice guidelines [ 18 , 19 ]. This reflects a more recent realisation that, while CRs may be low on the evidence-based medicine pyramid, they have a key role to play as a foundation of medical observation and often spur on further (statistical) research [ 20 , 21 ].…”

Overcoming fears: a pathway to publishing for early career researchers

“…Having the very first paper harshly rejected could add all the more to their lack of confidence. Obuku et al (2018) also find that confidence is a reason for low research productivity in low-middle income countries, as is the lack of use of postgraduate research in informing policy, along with poor supervision.…”