2019
DOI: 10.1111/obr.12848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review on biomechanical characteristics of walking in children and adolescents with overweight/obesity: Possible implications for the development of musculoskeletal disorders

Abstract: It is known that obesity is associated with biomechanical alterations during locomotor tasks, which is considered a potential risk factor for the development of musculoskeletal disorders (MSKD). However, the association of obesity with biomechanical alterations of walking in the early stages of life have not yet been systematically reviewed.Thus, this review aims to summarize the biomechanical characteristics of walking in children and adolescents with overweight/obesity (OW/OB) versus their normalweight (NW) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
86
3
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
86
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Five SRs exclusively examined longitudinal studies, 28,30,[35][36][37] and three only examined cross-sectional studies. 33,38,39 Seventy-nine of the 349 unique primary relevant studies were included in two or more SRs (23%, mean 1.32 SRs; range 1-5 SRs). CCA index for relevant primary studies was 1.6% (classified as very slight overlap).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Five SRs exclusively examined longitudinal studies, 28,30,[35][36][37] and three only examined cross-sectional studies. 33,38,39 Seventy-nine of the 349 unique primary relevant studies were included in two or more SRs (23%, mean 1.32 SRs; range 1-5 SRs). CCA index for relevant primary studies was 1.6% (classified as very slight overlap).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some SRs classified the strength of evidence according to the quality and/or percentage of studies supporting an association. 28,[31][32][33][34]39,41,45 Others used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. 30,38,43,46 3.1 | Mapping of studies within ICF…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations