A Systematic Review on Health Resilience to Economic Crises

Abstract

BackgroundThe health effects of recent economic crises differ markedly by population group. The objective of this systematic review is to examine evidence from longitudinal studies on factors influencing resilience for any health outcome or health behaviour among the general population living in countries exposed to financial crises.MethodsWe systematically reviewed studies from six electronic databases (EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science) which used quantitative longitudinal study designs and included: (i) exposure to an economic crisis; (ii) changes in health outcomes/behaviours over time; (iii) statistical tests of associations of health risk and/or protective factors with health outcomes/behaviours. The quality of the selected studies was appraised using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. PRISMA reporting guidelines were followed.ResultsFrom 14,584 retrieved records, 22 studies met the eligibility criteria. These studies were conducted across 10 countries in Asia, Europe and North America over the past two decades. Ten socio-demographic factors that increased or protected against health risk were identified: gender, age, education, marital status, household size, employment/occupation, income/ financial constraints, personal beliefs, health status, area of residence, and social relations. These studies addressed physical health, mortality, suicide and suicide attempts, mental health, and health behaviours. Women’s mental health appeared more susceptible to crises than men’s. Lower income levels were associated with greater increases in cardiovascular disease, mortality and worse mental health. Employment status was associated with changes in mental health. Associations with age, marital status, and education were less consistent, although higher education was associated with healthier behaviours.ConclusionsDespite widespread rhetoric about the importance of resilience, there was a dearth of studies which operationalised resilience factors. Future conceptual and empirical research is needed to develop the epidemiology of resilience.

Association between depression and resilience in older adults: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…The rating for each component ranges from 1 (low risk of bias; high methodological quality) to 3 (high risk of bias; low methodological quality). Thus, the papers selected were attributed a global rating, according to the component ratings, of WEAK, MODERATE, or STRONG, based on the following criteria: STRONG was attributed for studies with no “weak” ratings and at least three “moderate” ratings; MODERATE was attributed for those with one “weak” rating or at least three “strong” ratings; and WEAK was attributed to papers with two or more “weak” ratings (Stroup et al ., ; Glonti et al ., ).…”

Hardships of the Great Recession and health: Understanding varieties of vulnerability

“…Recession-related hardships may also amplify the negative health consequences of low educational attainment and possibly worsen social inequalities in health. In a review of prior recession findings (see Glonti et al, 2015), low educational attainment was more strongly associated with negative health outcomes during periods of economic downturns compared to before their onset. Additionally, Cutler et al, (2015) demonstrated that periods of high unemployment amplified the negative health consequences of low educational attainment.…”

Self-reported unemployment status and recession: An analysis on the Italian population with and without mental health problems

“…Moreover, economic recession tends to widen the social divide between people affected by mental illness and general population [8–12]. As a matter of fact, large-scale population studies reported that “unemployment” was strongly associated with a deterioration of mental health scores [13, 14]. …”