2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-018-1404-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review on metabolomics-based diagnostic biomarker discovery and validation in pancreatic cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
4
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The utility of a single biomarker is limited in terms of the actual potential of biomarker candidates in clinical settings. Multiplex biomarker panels combined with state-of-the-art statistical learning are expected to help improve the clinical usability of FOXs in early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of cancer patients [ 216 ].…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utility of a single biomarker is limited in terms of the actual potential of biomarker candidates in clinical settings. Multiplex biomarker panels combined with state-of-the-art statistical learning are expected to help improve the clinical usability of FOXs in early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of cancer patients [ 216 ].…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, meta-analysis has evolved as a method of choice to enhance the study's robustness and minimize the risk of false discoveries [141]. Finally, the value of meta-analysis in metabolomics has been demonstrated to increase the probability of determining metabolites associated with the phenotype of interest [142,143]. Robust meta-analysis and network-based interaction visualization frameworks should be investigated for metabolomics datasets to bring the interpretation of metabolomics data to the next level.…”
Section: Toward Reproducible Data Analysis and Interpretation In Clinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant features were assumed to be either [M-H]or [M+H] + ions. All mass windows were differences relative to one of the two states: [0.994, 1.012] = 1 13…”
Section: Adduct and Isotope Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metabolomics rapidly supplies information on thousands of molecules, and represents a method for biofluid-based diagnostics [7][8][9] . To date, serum, plasma, urine and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) metabolomics has been applied to many health states, ranging from cancers [10][11][12][13] and infectious diseases 14,15 to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) 16 , smoking 17 and Alzheimer's disease 18,19 . These studies are regularly performed using analytical instrumentation like liquid or gas chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS and GC-MS respectively) as well as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) 20 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%