2023
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review on Quadriceps Angle in Relation to Knee Abnormalities

Abstract: Previous studies on the quadriceps (Q) angle and its relation to knee problems have led to conflicting conclusions. In this comprehensive review, we evaluate recent studies on the Q angle and analyze the changes in Q angles. Specifically, we investigate the variation in Q angles when measured under the following conditions: 1) under various measurement techniques; 2) between symptomatic and nonsymptomatic groups; 3) between samples of men and women; 4) unilateral versus bilateral Q angles; 5) Q angle in adoles… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
(191 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our sample size ( N = 15) was relatively small, although larger than in other studies [ 5 , 6 , 17 ] on this topic. Second, only female tennis players were examined, that show a larger mean quadriceps angle compared to men [ 18 ], indicating that the present findings cannot be transferred to male players. Third, plantar pressure data were collected from elite players (ITN ≤ 2), thus the results cannot be generalized to lower skill levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our sample size ( N = 15) was relatively small, although larger than in other studies [ 5 , 6 , 17 ] on this topic. Second, only female tennis players were examined, that show a larger mean quadriceps angle compared to men [ 18 ], indicating that the present findings cannot be transferred to male players. Third, plantar pressure data were collected from elite players (ITN ≤ 2), thus the results cannot be generalized to lower skill levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%