2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review on soft-to-hard tissue ratios in orthognathic surgery part I: Maxillary repositioning osteotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
39
1
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
39
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of V-Y closure after Le Fort I osteotomy seemed to be able to improve the simulation slightly, in contrast to the use of alar cinch sutures. This finding confirmed that MTM algorithm was able to give an acceptable prediction of the vermillion show (Nadjmi et al, 2013), as a V-Y closure was carried out to counteract the tendency for the shortening of the upper lip and to allow some eversion of the vermillion border (San Miguel Moragas et al, 2014). The alar cinch suture was primarily used to stabilize the alar width after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of V-Y closure after Le Fort I osteotomy seemed to be able to improve the simulation slightly, in contrast to the use of alar cinch sutures. This finding confirmed that MTM algorithm was able to give an acceptable prediction of the vermillion show (Nadjmi et al, 2013), as a V-Y closure was carried out to counteract the tendency for the shortening of the upper lip and to allow some eversion of the vermillion border (San Miguel Moragas et al, 2014). The alar cinch suture was primarily used to stabilize the alar width after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Jeon et al reported in their 3D soft tissue study that debonding of the labial brackets caused positional changes of the vermilion border up to 1.4 mm (Jeon et al, 2013). In addition, difficulties in reproducing a relaxed lip position during CBCT scans might have also increased the variations in the simulation of lip position (Mobarak et al, 2001;San Miguel Moragas et al, 2014). From the technical point of view, the large errors in the lip regions can also be caused by the fact that the software moves the CT data of the upper and lower lip as a continuous area, instead of considering them as two separate anatomical structures that move separately (Marchetti et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study also showed that the A/subnasale ratio was 0.59 and different from the 0.33 reported in the 2D data. 17,18 We also found that the AP component of the A/subnasale ratio was 0.59 and different from the 0.33 reported in the 2D data (range 0.06 to 0.51; mean 0.33:1). 1924 The ratio of the subnasale to point A was smaller than that of the lower lip and chin, suggesting that more movement will be needed in this area to produce a harmonious change.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…El diagnóstico de sujetos con patología creaneofacial tradicionalmente se ha realizado con tecnología 2D utilizando cefalogramas bidimensionales (2D); bajo esa metodología se han desarrollado la mayoría de las investigaciones (San Miguel de Moragas et al, 2014;San Miguel de Moragas et al, 2015;Olate et al, 2016); sin embargo, las mismas investigaciones han demostrado variabilidad en resultados toda vez que la condición tridimensional (3D) del rostro limitan el consenso y precisión en los análisis 2D. Swennen et al (2006) indicaron que los estudios 2D son factibles de presentar sesgo en términos de relación entre tejidos duros y blandos; sin embargo, los estudios 3D no han mostrado claridad en los resultados presentados y se han observado múltiples sesgos en las investigaciones publicadas que aumentan las limitaciones observadas en los estudios (Olate et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified