2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review on soft-to-hard tissue ratios in orthognathic surgery part II: Chin procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…13,25 The B, Pog, and Me in our study responded at a ratio of nearly 0.9 to the corresponding hard tissues. The historical reports of mandibular setback surgery showed a 1:1 horizontal ratio at Pog and point B 20,21,28 ; however, the ratio for the same points reported in other studies was 0.9:1. 13,25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…13,25 The B, Pog, and Me in our study responded at a ratio of nearly 0.9 to the corresponding hard tissues. The historical reports of mandibular setback surgery showed a 1:1 horizontal ratio at Pog and point B 20,21,28 ; however, the ratio for the same points reported in other studies was 0.9:1. 13,25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…El diagnóstico de sujetos con patología creaneofacial tradicionalmente se ha realizado con tecnología 2D utilizando cefalogramas bidimensionales (2D); bajo esa metodología se han desarrollado la mayoría de las investigaciones (San Miguel de Moragas et al, 2014;San Miguel de Moragas et al, 2015;Olate et al, 2016); sin embargo, las mismas investigaciones han demostrado variabilidad en resultados toda vez que la condición tridimensional (3D) del rostro limitan el consenso y precisión en los análisis 2D. Swennen et al (2006) indicaron que los estudios 2D son factibles de presentar sesgo en términos de relación entre tejidos duros y blandos; sin embargo, los estudios 3D no han mostrado claridad en los resultados presentados y se han observado múltiples sesgos en las investigaciones publicadas que aumentan las limitaciones observadas en los estudios (Olate et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Trauner and Obwegeser (3) were the first surgeons to perform a chin advancement osteotomy via an intraoral approach and called it « ge-e86 nioplasty ». This technique was then modified by several others and used to move the chin in all three dimensions of space: setback genioplasty, impaction genioplasty, vertical height augmentation genioplasty, narrowing genioplasty and widening genioplasty (4). To obtain the best results in genioplasty, it is essential to make an optimal surgical plan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%