A Systematic Review on the Definition of UML Profiles

Pardillo, Jesús

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16145-2_28

Cited by 19 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the context of BPMN, there are no comparable approaches, that could be leveraged for the derivation of such criteria. However, there are few research articles addressing a systematic overview or classification of extensions in the field of the workflow modeling language BPEL [6] and UML profiles [17]. [6] evolves a classification framework for BPEL extensions based on the analysis of 62 publications.…”

Section: Bpmn Extension Analysis Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, some criteria like standard conformity, extension purpose and basic characteristics are adapted in the context of BPMN. [17] provides a systematic review of UML profiles based on the analysis of 39 publications. Although the focus lies on the analysis of UML profiles, the consideration of extended meta classes (see [17], p. 413) is promising in the context of BPMN since both modeling languages are defined by the Meta Object Facility (MOF).…”

Section: Bpmn Extension Analysis Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Classification of Domain-Specific BPMN Extensions

Braun

Esswein

2014

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International audienceBPMN is a standard for modeling business processes and provides meta model concepts for the design of extensions. Thus, domain-specific extensions of the BPMN are facilitated. This research article provides an overview of BPMN extension development by the descriptive analysis and classification of 30 BPMN extensions. An extensive literature review was conducted in order to find published extensions. Further, a classification framework was designed to enable a comprehensive analysis of each extension. The analysis showed, that four out of five extensions are not compliant with the BPMN standard. Also, we found several methodological shortcomings that should be tackled in further research

show abstract

Section: Bpmn Extension Analysis Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Bpmn Extension Analysis Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Classification of Domain-Specific BPMN Extensions

Braun

Esswein

2014

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A list of recently published UML profiles is available in [17]. Irrespective of the way these UML profiles were developed, either following ad-hoc processes or based on guidelines for designing well-structured UML profiles [5,19], they required substantial designer effort.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Each stereotype extends a core UML concept and includes extra information that is missing from that base concept. With profiles, UML offers a way for users to build domain-specific modelling languages (DSML) by re-using and extending UML concepts, thus lowering the entry barrier to DSML engineering by building on engineer familiarity with UML and UML tools (a detailed comparison of using UML profiles versus domain-specific modelling technology such as [2,17] is beyond the scope of this paper).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Automatic Generation of UML Profile Graphical Editors for Papyrus

Zolotas

Wei

Gerasimou

et al. 2018

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. We present an approach for defining the abstract and concrete syntax of UML profiles and their equivalent Papyrus graphical editors using annotated Ecore metamodels, driven by automated modelto-model and model-to-text transformations. We compare our approach against manual UML profile specification and implementation using Archimate, a non-trivial enterprise modelling language, and we demonstrate the substantial productivity and maintainability benefits it delivers.

show abstract

“…Since the introduction of the UML profile mechanism, numerous profiles have been developed [38], many of which are available by the OMG standardization body [36]. Even in industry, the practical value of profiles has been recognized as today's modeling tools offer already predefined stereotypes covered by such profiles.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

JUMP—From Java Annotations to UML Profiles

Bergmayr

Grossniklaus

Wimmer

et al. 2014

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The capability of UML profiles to serve as annotation mechanism has been recognized in both industry and research. Today's modeling tools offer profiles specific to platforms, such as Java, as they facilitate model-based engineering approaches. However, the set of available profiles is considerably smaller compared to the number of existing Java libraries using annotations. This is because an effective mapping between Java and UML to generate profiles from annotation-based libraries is missing. In this paper, we present JUMP to overcome this limitation, thereby continuing existing mapping efforts by emphasizing on annotations and profiles. We demonstrate the practical value of JUMP by contributing profiles that facilitate reverse-engineering and forward-engineering scenarios for the Java platform. The evaluation of JUMP shows that profiles can be automatically generated from Java libraries exhibiting equal or even improved quality compared to profiles currently used in practice.

show abstract

A Systematic Review on the Definition of UML Profiles

Cited by 19 publications

References 43 publications

Classification of Domain-Specific BPMN Extensions

Classification of Domain-Specific BPMN Extensions

Towards Automatic Generation of UML Profile Graphical Editors for Papyrus

JUMP—From Java Annotations to UML Profiles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About