A systematic review protocol examining workplace interventions that aim to improve employee health and wellbeing in male-dominated industries

Abstract

Background: The workplace environment potentially provides access to a large population who are employed, and it is an employer's responsibility to provide appropriate conditions for its employees. Whilst the aetiology of cardiovascular disease is multifactorial, it is generally acknowledged that working conditions, gender and age are involved in its development. Male-dominated industries (comprising > 70% male workers, e.g., agriculture, construction, manufacturing, mining, transport and technology) have a higher prevalence of health risk behaviours than other population subgroups. Working in a gender-dominated industry can impact an employee's health and wellbeing, particularly for the opposite sex. This systematic review examines workplace interventions that address the health and wellbeing of employees in maledominated industries. Methods: We will include randomised controlled trials and studies with non-randomised intervention groups. The interventions must aim to improve employee physical and/or mental health and wellbeing implemented in the workplace in male-dominated industries. There will be no limits on date. The following electronic databases will be searched for published studies: Web of Science, Embed, MedLine, PsycInfo and the Cochrane Database. The search strategy will include free-text terms and MeSH vocabulary, including 'male-dominated industries', 'workplace interventions', 'occupational stress', 'mental health', 'cardiovascular disease', 'blood pressure', 'body mass index' and 'exercise'. Two authors will independently select, review and extract data from studies that meet the inclusion criteria. The Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool will be used to assess risk of bias. We will perform structured summaries of the included studies and, if possible, conduct meta-analyses or construct an Albatross plot. Discussion: There are an increasing number of interventions designed to improve employee health and wellbeing in the workplace, but no prior review that systematically evaluates their effectiveness. A systematic review is required to prioritise the future implementation of those interventions found to be most effective. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42019161283

The effect of workplace lifestyle programmes on diet, physical activity, and weight‐related outcomes for working women: A systematic review using the TIDieR checklist

“…A thorough investigation into whether these same findings are applicable to men is required to add to current research. 72,73 Future research should also assess the barriers and facilitators of healthy lifestyle behaviours specific to working women in order to identify optimal strategies for intervention and the effect of lifestyle interventions on workplace productivity.…”

Assessing the health benefits of development interventions

“…The recent Cochrane review of housing improvements to prevent malaria, the oldest intervention against this disease, included only two studies of 4102 screened. 5 Third, focusing systematic reviews on single health outcomes is logical for biomedical interventions, but misses the bigger picture for development interventions with wide co-benefits ( figure 1 ). 6 For example, a re-review of a Cochrane-standard systematic review of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions’ impact on child diarrhoea morbidity examined impacts within studies from a joint health and development perspective.…”

Assessment of Muscle Activity during a Deadlift Performed by Trained and Untrained Construction Workers

“…According to Hulls, et al [10], the construction industry is predominantly male, and male-dominated industries have a higher prevalence of risky health behaviors, and male habits may contribute to poorer health outcomes. The risk factors associated with this profession are exacerbated by the poor health habits of CWs, such as smoking, alcohol consumption, overweight and obesity [11][12][13][14][15]. As such a physically and psychologically demanding occupation, CWs are exposed to high levels of physical activity (PA) and subsequent fatigue on a daily basis, which promotes negative health outcomes [2,7,9,15,16].…”