2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systemic approach to moisture problems in buildings for mould safety modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, instead of determining the best model for a particular problem, the main purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effect of the hybrid method we propose on the predictive performance. Therefore, this study implemented several classifiers using common classification algorithms including decision tree (DT) [30,31], support vector machine (SVM) [32][33][34], and k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) [28,35], as well as three classifiers applying ensemble learning strategies [28], and then conducted the training process using these classifiers upon two training datasets, one with the feedback from rule-based reasoning and the other without it, and compared both predictive performances. The decision tree is chosen because it works well with both numerical and categorical features and provides interpretability for decision-making [29], while SVM can generate robust results for complex classification problems [15].…”
Section: Classification Algorithms and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, instead of determining the best model for a particular problem, the main purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effect of the hybrid method we propose on the predictive performance. Therefore, this study implemented several classifiers using common classification algorithms including decision tree (DT) [30,31], support vector machine (SVM) [32][33][34], and k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) [28,35], as well as three classifiers applying ensemble learning strategies [28], and then conducted the training process using these classifiers upon two training datasets, one with the feedback from rule-based reasoning and the other without it, and compared both predictive performances. The decision tree is chosen because it works well with both numerical and categorical features and provides interpretability for decision-making [29], while SVM can generate robust results for complex classification problems [15].…”
Section: Classification Algorithms and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This systemic approach provides a proper theoretical tool for the analysis of the interrelations between the structure, its environment and its performance. An example of systemic model of a building, applicable in building physics studies, is shown in Figure 2 [19].…”
Section: Form Versus Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The building site in the district of Gothenburg has been considered and can be described as a semi-urban area with the surface roughness equal Figure 2. Building/Environment system applied in a traditional building physics analysis [19]. The house was constructed in 1979 with the intention of using it for experimental studies in building physics with focus on ventilation and energy saving.…”
Section: Description Of the Test Housementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A passive control creates an extra climate-comfort loop (see Figure 1). Figure 1 Bioclimatic thinking at the early stage of the design process -systemic approach; modified from (Pietrzyk 2015).…”
Section: Communication Of Building Climatology Principles To Support mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way of presenting performance criterion depends on the investigated problem and availability of data. Stochastic threshold criterion is built up because of the uncertainties regarding the climatic conditions or humans response (Pietrzyk 2008, Pietrzyk 2015. Generally, variability in time, space, and among individuals can be included in the performance criterion R (see Figure 3).…”
Section: Boundaries Of a Comfort Zone -A Probabilistic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%