2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systemic comparative assessment of the multifunctional performance of alternative olive systems in Spain within an AHP-extended framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
33
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These comparisons were used to obtain the relative importance, or weight, of each criterion and adaptation measure. The criteria were chosen based on expert opinions and reviews of the multi-criteria literature on evaluation of adaptation strategies related to water and agriculture (de Bruin et al 2009;Parra-López et al 2008). In total, 20 in-depth interviews were undertaken among various stakeholders (policy-makers, farmers, environmental organizations and academics) selected following previous stakeholder mappings in the area (Varela-Ortega 2011).…”
Section: Comparative Evaluation and Ranking Of Adaptation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These comparisons were used to obtain the relative importance, or weight, of each criterion and adaptation measure. The criteria were chosen based on expert opinions and reviews of the multi-criteria literature on evaluation of adaptation strategies related to water and agriculture (de Bruin et al 2009;Parra-López et al 2008). In total, 20 in-depth interviews were undertaken among various stakeholders (policy-makers, farmers, environmental organizations and academics) selected following previous stakeholder mappings in the area (Varela-Ortega 2011).…”
Section: Comparative Evaluation and Ranking Of Adaptation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El 26,7% restante está explicado por la constante, lo cual signiica que la situación actual del olivar andaluz es valorada por los individuos, además de por las tres funciones ambientales considerada en el diseño, por algunas otras no recogidas en este ejercicio de valoración. Esta evidencia estaría en línea con numerosos resultados anteriores de investigación (Viladomiu y Rosell, 2004;Guzmán Álvarez, 2005;Kallas et al, 2006;Parra-López et al, 2008;EC, 2010;Salazar et al, 2010), que ponen de maniiesto el conjunto amplio de bienes pú-blicos (de carácter tanto ambiental como social) que el cultivo del olivar provee a la sociedad. Entre ellos pueden señalarse la provisión de paisajes agrarios tradicionales, la ijación de población en zonas rurales marginales, la conservación del patrimonio cultural (productos agrarios típicos), la seguridad alimentaria, etc., que no han sido considerados en nuestro diseño y que justiica este valor de la contante.…”
Section: Funciones De Utilidad Multiatributo Individuales Y Función Dunclassified
“…The target has been to choose the best options for transferring environmentally sound technologies to developing countries (Ramanathan, 2002), to determine the priority of use of alternative irrigation technologies (Karami, 2006), to assess different research trajectories concerning biotechnology in order to select the most promising research activities (Braunschweig, 2000), or to compare conventional cultivation techniques with regard to others judged more environmentally-friendly (Parra et al, 2007(Parra et al, , 2008. Even though pursuing this line of research, we intend to avoid some of the shortcomings of AHP that frequently surface when facing complex real-world situations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%