2005
DOI: 10.1007/11554554_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Tableau Algorithm for Description Logics with Concrete Domains and GCIs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, LTL({x = y}) with the freeze operator is shown Σ 1 1 -complete in [DLN05,LP05] The pspace-completeness of PLTL mod leaves open for which constraint system D (not necessarily fragment of Presburger arithmetic), LTL over D is decidable in pspace. Necessary conditions are provided in [DD03] to guarantee the polynomial space upper bound (completion property and frame checking in pspace) and similar conditions are also introduced in [BC02,LM05]. The question is however open in full generality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, LTL({x = y}) with the freeze operator is shown Σ 1 1 -complete in [DLN05,LP05] The pspace-completeness of PLTL mod leaves open for which constraint system D (not necessarily fragment of Presburger arithmetic), LTL over D is decidable in pspace. Necessary conditions are provided in [DD03] to guarantee the polynomial space upper bound (completion property and frame checking in pspace) and similar conditions are also introduced in [BC02,LM05]. The question is however open in full generality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasoning is for checking concept and role instances and for query answering over a satisfiable ontology [9,11]. Ontology satisfiability is to verify whether ontology O admits at least one model where consistency properties should be verified.…”
Section: Reasoning Over Imprecise Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reasoning over vague ontologies using the proposed vagueness theory, we have added the following two expansion rules that should be applied after every expansion by a classical Tableau rule (the reader can be referred to [4,5,9] for the classical Tableau rules). We will get a clash (contradiction) if any new set of truth gaps assertions is not acceptable (Lemma 1 and Equation 4).…”
Section: Reasoning Over Imprecise Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The translated query is then evaluated for subsumption relationship with previously stored query in the cache by using the sound and complete subsumption algorithm given in (Baader et al,91b) (Lutz et al, 2005).…”
Section: Subsumption Analysis Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%