2023
DOI: 10.3390/batteries9070383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Tale of Nickel-Iron Batteries: Its Resurgence in the Age of Modern Batteries

Justine Marie E. Abarro,
Jon Nyner L. Gavan,
Daniel Eldrei D. Loresca
et al.

Abstract: The nickel-iron (Ni-Fe) battery is a century-old technology that fell out of favor compared to modern batteries such as lead–acid and lithium-ion batteries. However, in the last decade, there has been a resurgence of interest because of its robustness and longevity, making it well-suited for niche applications, such as off-grid energy storage systems. Currently, extensive research is focused on addressing perennial issues such as iron passivation and hydrogen evolution reaction, which limit the battery’s energ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that economic analysis of battery technologies for grid energy storage may not be that simple by just considering the raw materials cost, and should involve evaluating initial costs, lifespan, maintenance, efficiency, degradation rates, operational expenses, and other factors. For instance, Fe-Ni batteries have higher costs than lead–acid batteries but generally offer longer lifespans [ 49 ]. Beyond the factors mentioned, environmental and safety considerations, regulatory compliance, material availability, and integration costs with grid infrastructure are also crucial in determining the overall financial viability and cost-effectiveness of these systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that economic analysis of battery technologies for grid energy storage may not be that simple by just considering the raw materials cost, and should involve evaluating initial costs, lifespan, maintenance, efficiency, degradation rates, operational expenses, and other factors. For instance, Fe-Ni batteries have higher costs than lead–acid batteries but generally offer longer lifespans [ 49 ]. Beyond the factors mentioned, environmental and safety considerations, regulatory compliance, material availability, and integration costs with grid infrastructure are also crucial in determining the overall financial viability and cost-effectiveness of these systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later on, Ni–Fe batteries were developed mainly in the last 30 years to improve the overall efficiency of the battery. 52–65 Next, iron–air and iron-redox flow batteries were also developed in 1961 and 1981, respectively, and popularized with time. After that, various findings were reported on developing the electrodes and electrolytes for the iron–air and iron-redox flow batteries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers are utilizing advanced software tools like HOMER to intricately weave energy storage solutions into electrification systems for remote regions, all while considering the potential for grid integration. Most researchers commonly utilized lead acid (LA) [24], lithium-ion (LI) [25] and nickel-iron (IN) [26] battery technologies. However, these battery technologies have disadvantages, which are unpacked as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%