2021
DOI: 10.1097/hco.0000000000000942
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tale of two balloons: technical and procedural difference between cryoballoon systems

Abstract: Purpose of review The cryoballoon catheter has been an option for the treatment of atrial fibrillation for over a decade. The most widely used device is the Medtronic Arctic Advance cryoballoon catheter. Recently, Boston Scientific has released the POLARx cryoballoon catheter. Here we review the major changes in the catheter system's design and its implications for procedural practice. Recent findings The POLARx cryoballoon catheter has been approved for use in Europe. Some… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the recently launched POLARx cryoballoon (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) is made of a proprietary thermoplastic material, which allows the balloon more compliance when engaging with PV. 19 The intra-balloon pressure is continuously monitored and adjusted at a constant low level (2.5-7.5 psi depending on size of balloon) by an equipped pressure sensor. Therefore, the intra-balloon pressure, balloon shape, size and stiffness of POLARx balloon remain stable after freezing starts in contrast to the Medtronic's cryoballoon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the recently launched POLARx cryoballoon (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) is made of a proprietary thermoplastic material, which allows the balloon more compliance when engaging with PV. 19 The intra-balloon pressure is continuously monitored and adjusted at a constant low level (2.5-7.5 psi depending on size of balloon) by an equipped pressure sensor. Therefore, the intra-balloon pressure, balloon shape, size and stiffness of POLARx balloon remain stable after freezing starts in contrast to the Medtronic's cryoballoon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovative designs have emerged to possibly prevent cryoballoons from dislodgement during freezing. For instance, the recently launched POLARx cryoballoon (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) is made of a proprietary thermoplastic material, which allows the balloon more compliance when engaging with PV 19 . The intra‐balloon pressure is continuously monitored and adjusted at a constant low level (2.5–7.5 psi depending on size of balloon) by an equipped pressure sensor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, The POLARsheath™ (BosSci) does not have a step-up between the dilator and sheath, and has a 155°angle of deflection with the goal of affording more maneuverability particularly for occlusion of the often challenging right inferior pulmonary vein, or other difficult anatomies. 4 The PolarX™ thermoplastic balloon itself is designed to maintain a constant pressure, stiffness and shape throughout inflation and ablation. As well, the balloon is available in a 28 and 31 mm size compared to the 28 mm size of the Arctic Front™ (Medtronic) although the present study primarily examined the 28 mm sized balloon with a 50 patient extension arm examining the interchangeable balloon size (28 and 31 mm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mapping catheter in theory can be withdrawn without compromising balloon stability. 4 Thus, the overarching question for the present analysis was whether the differences in design of the PolarX™ balloon and ablation system afford procedural ease or better efficacy compared to previously available technology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the article by Tomaiko-Clark et al article [1] in the January 2022 issue, an error was made in regard to the design specifications of the Boston Scientific POLARx balloon. The POLARx balloon is pressurized to a constant 2.5 psi through inflation and ablation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%