2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsma.2017.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tale of two islands: Decadal changes in rocky reef fish assemblages following implementation of no-take marine protected areas in New South Wales, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consistency of the relative differences and log effects size ratios among bioregions (Table 1) indicates that the NTMR effects for C. auratus are general and profound across the state's coastline, despite the substantial differences in the absolute MaxN values among bioregions. Considering longer periods of time, the changes in the relative abundance of C. auratus reported here in this time series reflects the general patterns quantified within specific marine parks across the state (Kelaher et al 2014, 2015b, e.g., Malcolm et al 2015a,b, 2018, Harasti et al 2018a and/or show a maturing of initial patterns (Kelaher et al 2014, Coleman et al 2015. Internationally, similar effects of protection have been observed for C. auratus in several marine reserves in New Zealand where it is also a dominant species on subtidal rocky reefs (Babcock et al 1999, Denny et al 2004, Smith et al 2014, Schiel et al 2018, Appendix S1: Table S3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The consistency of the relative differences and log effects size ratios among bioregions (Table 1) indicates that the NTMR effects for C. auratus are general and profound across the state's coastline, despite the substantial differences in the absolute MaxN values among bioregions. Considering longer periods of time, the changes in the relative abundance of C. auratus reported here in this time series reflects the general patterns quantified within specific marine parks across the state (Kelaher et al 2014, 2015b, e.g., Malcolm et al 2015a,b, 2018, Harasti et al 2018a and/or show a maturing of initial patterns (Kelaher et al 2014, Coleman et al 2015. Internationally, similar effects of protection have been observed for C. auratus in several marine reserves in New Zealand where it is also a dominant species on subtidal rocky reefs (Babcock et al 1999, Denny et al 2004, Smith et al 2014, Schiel et al 2018, Appendix S1: Table S3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The difference in zoning response in comparison to Broughton Island may be attributed to the fact that the Fingal Island no-take area covers a smaller area (297 vs. 828 ha), as it is well documented that the size of protected areas affects the effectiveness in increasing fish biomass (Gaines et al, 2010;Malcolm et al, 2016). It has also recently been shown that both Labrids (wrasses) and Sparids were found to significantly increase in abundance within the Broughton Island no-take area compared with only small increases in the Fingal Island notake area (Harasti et al, 2017). Chrysophrys auratus are known to utilize urchin barren habitats (Babcock et al, 1999;Parsons et al, 2014) and given that the Broughton Island no-take area is dominated by Centrostephanus rodgersii urchin barrens, whilst Fingal Island is dominated by kelp Ecklonia radiata (Masens, 2009), it is likely that differing relative abundances between the two locations are influenced by both size and habitats within the no-take areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were examined on fishing activity in two NTAs in the Port Stephens–Great Lakes Marine Park (PSGLMP) in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, to improve understanding about the influence of how short‐term temporal factors influence illegal fishing in NTAs. The PSGLMP is a popular region for recreational fishing (Read, West, Haste, & Jordan, ) and is an important area for fishery target species such as snapper Chrysophrys auratus (Forster), which are in high relative abundance in NTAs compared with fished areas (Harasti, Davis, Mitchell, Lindfield, & Smith, ; Harasti, Williams, Mitchell, Lindfield, & Jordan, ) and also display strong site fidelity within a NTA (Harasti, Lee, Gallen, Hughes, & Stewart, ). A study by Harasti et al () reported illegal recreational fishing within a NTA reduced both the size and abundance of C. auratus .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%