2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tale of two seas: Reservoir age correction values (R, ΔR) for the Sakhalin Island (Sea of Japan and Okhotsk Sea)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiocarbon ages are given according to the convention outlined by Stuiver and Polach (1977) and Stuiver (1980) and summarized in Table 2. We applied reservoir age correction of +900 yr (Max et al, 2012) for core SO178-13-6, which is determined by a marine global average reservoir age correction of +400 yr (Reimer et al, 2013) and a local planktic reservoir age correction ( R) of +500 yr reported for the Okhotsk Sea environment (Kuzmin et al, 2001(Kuzmin et al, , 2007. There is increasing evidence that surface reservoir ages could have varied over the course of the last 20 kyr, due to global thermohaline reorganizations as well as changes in upper-ocean stratification.…”
Section: Radiocarbon Dating (Ams 14 C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiocarbon ages are given according to the convention outlined by Stuiver and Polach (1977) and Stuiver (1980) and summarized in Table 2. We applied reservoir age correction of +900 yr (Max et al, 2012) for core SO178-13-6, which is determined by a marine global average reservoir age correction of +400 yr (Reimer et al, 2013) and a local planktic reservoir age correction ( R) of +500 yr reported for the Okhotsk Sea environment (Kuzmin et al, 2001(Kuzmin et al, , 2007. There is increasing evidence that surface reservoir ages could have varied over the course of the last 20 kyr, due to global thermohaline reorganizations as well as changes in upper-ocean stratification.…”
Section: Radiocarbon Dating (Ams 14 C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of the reservoir age for the western Bering Sea are lacking, so, in order to calibrate marine radiocarbon ages, researchers have to use ΔR = 698 ± 50 14 C years obtained ~2,000 km southwest, at Sakhalin Island in the Okhotsk Sea (Kuzmin et al 2007), or a value from two known age shells of Mytilus edulis from ~1,550 km northeast at Port Clarence, Alaska, which yield a mean ΔR and standard deviation of 497 ± 83 14 C years (McNeely et al 2006).…”
Section: Marker Tephra Layers From Ploskymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top of BC32 has a conventional 14 C age on N. pachyderma of 430 ± 35 BP and a date near the bottom (41.5 cm) is 2230 ± 30 BP (Table 1). Because ΔR in Okhotsk Sea surface waters is 578 ± 50 yr (Kuzmin et al 2007), the core top age is about 550 14 C yr younger than the expected pre-bomb age and probably reflects the presence of bomb-produced 14 C. The calibrated age at 41.5 cm is about 1200 BP, so the rate of sedimentation assuming zero age at the top is 33 cm/kyr, about three times higher than Nesmeyanov core 15. In addition to the planktonic 14 C and δ 18 O results, the core top Cibicidoides δ 13 C and δ 18 O (Keigwin 1998) also indicate that BC32 has an unusually good record of the past 1000 yr, right up to today.…”
Section: Measurements In Benthic Foraminiferamentioning
confidence: 89%