2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.107264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tale of two signals: Global and local influences on the Late Pleistocene loess sequences in Bulgarian Lower Danube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E.g., LPS in the lower Danube Basin clearly lack evidence for higher humidity during MIS-2. Instead, they show maximum loess accumulation rates 25 , 66 . Regions north of the Greater Caucasus showed severe loess deposition during MIS-2, too 100 , 103 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…E.g., LPS in the lower Danube Basin clearly lack evidence for higher humidity during MIS-2. Instead, they show maximum loess accumulation rates 25 , 66 . Regions north of the Greater Caucasus showed severe loess deposition during MIS-2, too 100 , 103 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Regions north of the Greater Caucasus showed severe loess deposition during MIS-2, too 100 , 103 . In case of the lower Danube Basin, it is assumed that increased loess deposition during MIS-2 was caused by stronger effects of the SH that reached far west into E and SE Europe and blocked the Atlantic influences 25 , 66 . This, in turn, shows that the mountain range of the Greater Caucasus formed a kind of climate barrier that sheltered the Kura Basin and surrounding areas against the influences of the SH during MIS-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), which indicates different depositional rates. This further implies local influences on the development of each profile on a sub-orbital scale, as suggested by Fenn et al (2021).…”
Section: Research Area and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There is an increasing balance of evidence indicating spatial variability in loess stratigraphy relating to spatial differences in accumulation rates and palaeo-topography, particularly in piedmont regions (e.g., Fitzsimmons, 2017;Dave et al, 2023a), although in aggregate it may still be possible to make regional correlations and identify "representative" type sections (e.g., Marković et al, 2015a). Even over scales of tens to hundreds of meters, variability in stratigraphy may be observed (e.g., Fitzsimmons et al, 2013;Fenn et al, 2021). Furthermore, although the thick loess sequences exposed in the Tajik Depression have long been recognized for their potential as archives down to at least the Brunhes-Matuyama boundary (e.g., Dodonov et al, 2006;Yang et al, 2006, Jia et al, 2018Dodonov et al, 2006, Lü et al, 2020, few sections have been investigated in high resolution and with robust dating over the last full glacial cycle.…”
Section: Considerations Of Loess Stratigraphy In the Tajik Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%