2020
DOI: 10.21791/ijems.2020.1.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A társadalmi vállalkozások Balanced Scorecard rendszerének kialakítása a szociális szövetkezetek példáján – külső szervezetek igényeinek való megfelelés

Abstract: A szociális szövetkezetek gazdálkodási problémáinak feltárása érdekében kérdőíves kutatást végeztünk. A kutatásunk megállapította, hogy a rendelkezésre álló munkaerő minősége és a megfelelő célpiacok megtalálása jelenti a szociális szövetkezetek fő gondját. A kérdőíves felmérés alapján elkészítettük a szociális szövetkezetek Balanced Scorecard rendszerének (továbbiakban BSC) egy lehetséges modelljét. Modellünk a Bull által kidolgozott modell egy adaptációja (Bull, 2006). Jelen cikkünkben a BSC külső szervezete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Democratic decision-making might also be a source of tension. First, while not every member of an SE is actively engaged in managing its operations (“It’s difficult to convene a general meeting as this has ten members, and [difficult] to make decisions, as [participants] actually have no idea what’s going on here” [4]), in many cases – particularly in the case of SCs – every member has voting rights of equal weight (Szemán, 2017) (“So when we have to make a decision on whether there will be dividends at the end of the year or not, or we generated a profit, let’s say two million forints [approx. 5,200 EUR] and [when deciding] what we should do[…] It’s really difficult, and we have very serious debates” [2]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Democratic decision-making might also be a source of tension. First, while not every member of an SE is actively engaged in managing its operations (“It’s difficult to convene a general meeting as this has ten members, and [difficult] to make decisions, as [participants] actually have no idea what’s going on here” [4]), in many cases – particularly in the case of SCs – every member has voting rights of equal weight (Szemán, 2017) (“So when we have to make a decision on whether there will be dividends at the end of the year or not, or we generated a profit, let’s say two million forints [approx. 5,200 EUR] and [when deciding] what we should do[…] It’s really difficult, and we have very serious debates” [2]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the respondents was the following: Source: (Szemán et al, 2020) Majority of the respondents came from the less developed part of Hungary mirrored the fact, that the social cooperative mission is to help the rural, poor region. From Southern Plain 40%, from South Transdanubia 19%, from Northern Plain 17% and from Northern Hungary 14%.…”
Section: Questionnaire On the Managerial Problems Of Hungarian Social Cooperativesmentioning
confidence: 99%