A Taxonomic Perspective on Certification Schemes: Development of a Taxonomy for Cloud Service Certification Criteria

Abstract

Numerous cloud service certifications (CSCs) are emerging in practice. However, in their striving to establish the market standard, CSC initiatives proceed independently, resulting in a disparate collection of CSCs that are predominantly proprietary, based on various standards, and differ in terms of scope, audit process, and underlying certification schemes. Although literature suggests that a certification's design influences its effectiveness, research on CSC design is lacking and there are no commonly agreed structural characteristics of CSCs. Informed by data from 13 expert interviews and 7 cloud computing standards, this paper delineates and structures CSC knowledge by developing a taxonomy for criteria to be assessed in a CSC. The taxonomy consists of 6 dimensions with 28 subordinate characteristics and classifies 328 criteria, thereby building foundations for future research to systematically develop and investigate the efficacy of CSC designs as well as providing a knowledge base for certifiers, cloud providers, and users.

Determinant Factors of Cloud-Sourcing Decisions: Reflecting on the IT Outsourcing Literature in the Era of Cloud Computing

“…Each stakeholder group shapes the decision process and outcome; engages in different activities, possesses specific decision rights, responsibilities, and information needs; and pursues a unique set of goals (Webster and Wind, 1972;Howcroft and Light, 2010;Bidwell, 2012;Harnisch et al, 2013;Winkler and Brown, 2013). For instance, a legal department may require different information and may have different requirements for cloud services than an IT department or the business unit (Schneider et al, 2014). In particular, because of the peculiarities of CC, such as the changed role of the IT department and the adapted decision processes, research adopting the perspectives of multiple stakeholders regarding cloud-sourcing decisions might yield fruitful results.…”

From Hype to Reality: A Taxonomy of Blockchain Applications

“…Taxonomies are used to organize knowledge in many fields (e.g., Darwin's classification of species in biology) [4,10,24,31]. We choose a taxonomy as the fundamental tool to organize knowledge on blockchains [26].…”

Cloud Computing Migration Barriers and Advantages in Manufacturing – An Analysis of Ambiguity and Dependences in the Assessment Criteria

“…However, the used approaches were focused mainly on qualitative expertbased methods. For instance El-Gazzar, Hustad and Olsen used the Delphi study approach [El-Gazzar et al 2016], Schneider et al adopted the expert-based taxonomy creation method [Schneider et al 2014]. Empirical studies are usually limited to the utilization of descriptive statistics [Lian et al 2014] and deductive methods based on econometrical modelling (logit models) for verifying the hypotheses regarding the assumed relationships [Low et al 2011].…”