2004
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v5i1.1970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A TCP‐NTCP estimation module using DVHs and known radiobiological models and parameter sets

Abstract: Radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation relies on an implicit estimation of the tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) arising from a given dose distribution. A potential application of radiobiological modeling to radiotherapy is the ranking of treatment plans via a more explicit determination of TCP and NTCP values. Although the limited predictive capabilities of current radiobiological models prevent their use as a primary evaluative tool, radiobiological modeling pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, each homogeneous dose level of the dDVH was converted to a total dose delivered in 2 Gy fractions with the biological effective dose (BED) method, (22) with α/β=4.6Gy (23) . Next, the TCP was calculated using the Poisson model for an inhomogeneous dose distribution (24) using Eq. (1): TCP=false(1/2false)normalinormalvnormaliexp(2γ50(1normalDnormali/normalD50)/ln2)with vi the volume irradiated to a homogeneous dose Di, D50 the dose that locally controls 50% of the tumors, and γ50 the expected change in TCP if the dose changes by 1% around normalD50.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, each homogeneous dose level of the dDVH was converted to a total dose delivered in 2 Gy fractions with the biological effective dose (BED) method, (22) with α/β=4.6Gy (23) . Next, the TCP was calculated using the Poisson model for an inhomogeneous dose distribution (24) using Eq. (1): TCP=false(1/2false)normalinormalvnormaliexp(2γ50(1normalDnormali/normalD50)/ln2)with vi the volume irradiated to a homogeneous dose Di, D50 the dose that locally controls 50% of the tumors, and γ50 the expected change in TCP if the dose changes by 1% around normalD50.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the clinical follow‐up study, only the prescribed dose was known. Hence, the TCP of the homogeneous delivery of the prescription dose, (24) (i.e., 93.4%) was the reference TCP for further investigation, starting with its comparison to the mean TCPPBCHom, using the Student's t ‐test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DVHs may be a preliminary step in evaluating statistics such as tumor control and normal tissue complication probabilities. ( 5 , 6 ) However, when comparing a large number of plans, DVHs contain large amounts of data and make the comparison difficult and cumbersome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biologically related models, such as tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), have been widely used for evaluating the quality of RT plans 20 , 21 , 22 . In particular, several studies addressed TCP models for an inhomogeneously irradiated tumor 23 , 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%