A Team Formation Framework for Managing Diversity in Multidisciplinary Engineering Project

Abstract

Abstract-Team formation is one of the essential elements in constructing effective teamwork of any team size that requires different skill sets. Diversity in team encourages students to challenge and compete with one another while searching for new ideas, which in turn can lead to a better team performance. In a well-functioning diverse teams, the students who performed poorly may gain benefit by observing how excellent students approach the assignments. They may also benefit by getting advice and assistance from the excellent students. Studies have shown that Malaysian university graduates lack of team skills. The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework for forming a diverse multidisciplinary team among engineering undergraduates based on selected criteria such as individual personality type, gender, and other relevant demographic information. The proposed framework can also be used to design an automated team-formation system based on the identified metrics. The purpose of the framework is to consolidate the existing team formation literature, and to develop and test interventions for maximizing individual member and team performance as a whole that makes an effective team. For this study, a multidisciplinary approach was used where first year engineering students from three different faculties, namely Faculty of Electrical Engineering (FKE), Faculty of Mechanical Engineering (FKM), and Faculty of Biosciences and Medical Engineering (FBME) at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) worked on an innovation project using the Conceive, Design, Implement, and Operate (CDIO) framework. Keirsey Temperament Sorter was used as an instrument to identify an individual's personality type.

Disaggregated General Chemistry Grades Reveal Differential Success among BIPOC Students in Partial Flipped Team Learning Classrooms

“…The team learning aspect provided students a valuable network of learners, particularly as team construction factored in barriers to participation . Teams were set by the instructor with the goal of acquiring the most diverse team possible, including gender, race/ethnicity (to the best estimate possible), math skills, science interest/experience, external obligations, and leadership and collaboration potential. ,− Evaluations for team placement required instructors to learn about individual students’ goals and challenges.…”

“…However, these same students were more likely to persist in STEM majors if they achieved a C– or better in GChem1 . This suggests that shifting faculty and student perceptions from a personal-deficit model (students are not interested) will help to identify and counteract the existing barriers to equitable participation in STEM classes. , …”

Design and Implementation of Integral Ergo-Value Stream Mapping in a Metal-Mechanical Company to Improve Ergonomic and Productive Conditions: A Case Study

“…This will allow each one to contribute with different knowledge and ideas to developing the Ergo-VSM. The main characteristics of the work team should be participation, responsibility, preparation, flexibility, and communication [57].…”

Team Formation Using a Systems Thinking Approach

“…Although some researchers have focused on technical knowledge, teamwork experience, personal characteristics, communication skills, culture, leadership or motivation (Chen and Chen, ; Wi et al, ), technical knowledge is the most widely used measure in the team formation literature for selecting team members (Chen and Lin, ; Wi et al, ; Zhang and Zhang, ; Hussein et al, ).…”