2016
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A technical application of quantitative next generation sequencing for chimerism evaluation

Abstract: At present, the most common genetic diagnostic method for chimerism evaluation following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is microsatellite analysis by capillary electrophoresis. The main objective was to establish, through repeated analysis over time, if a complete chimerism was present, or if the mixed chimerism was stable, increasing or decreasing over time. Considering the recent introduction of next generation sequencing (NGS) in clinical diagnostics, a detailed study evaluating an NGS protocol was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not detect any donor carrying a clonal hematopoiesis-related mutation [20]. The number of informative SNPs was variable (median 25.5, range 9-41) and higher than that of STR (median 10.5, range [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Donor chimerism from NGS analysis highly correlated with results from STR analysis, with r 2 = 0.994 (p < 0.0001) by least-squares analysis (Figure 2a), and all data points were within 3 SDs of the mean % difference on Blant-Altman plot (Figure 2b).…”
Section: Analytical Performance Of Ngs Donor Chimerismmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We did not detect any donor carrying a clonal hematopoiesis-related mutation [20]. The number of informative SNPs was variable (median 25.5, range 9-41) and higher than that of STR (median 10.5, range [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Donor chimerism from NGS analysis highly correlated with results from STR analysis, with r 2 = 0.994 (p < 0.0001) by least-squares analysis (Figure 2a), and all data points were within 3 SDs of the mean % difference on Blant-Altman plot (Figure 2b).…”
Section: Analytical Performance Of Ngs Donor Chimerismmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For NGS chimerism analysis, we reviewed all the identified SNPs as the frequency of heterozygosity in the general Korean population (the Korean reference genome database investigated 1722 Korean individuals). The homozygous and heterozygous alleles were determined by base count frequency of 90-100% and 45-60% [8], respectively. We examined 153 SNPs with a frequency of heterozygosity ranging from 0.2 to 0.8 in the Korean database and selected optimal SNPs for NGS chimerism analysis based on the following criteria: (1) >500 mean read depth, (2) ≤0.2% BE, and (3) <10% measurement error of heterozygous alleles (ME, difference of read count between reference and alternative alleles) [19].…”
Section: Snp-based Ngs Chimerism Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, detection of informative loci is accomplished through massively-parallel sequencing, which provides sequence information for each capture event and allows them to be accurately mapped within the genome, further reducing the measurement of stochastic, off-target captures. These features offer advantages over next generation sequencing approaches that identify chimerism based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (36,37), which are subject to sequencing errors that limit their sensitivity(7,37). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discuss SNP array as a technique able to identify chimerism also suggesting which one of the complex mechanisms underlying chimera formation could be responsible (Biesecker & Spinner, 2013). Subsequently, a custom nextgeneration sequence (NGS) panel was used for chimerism quantification (Aloisio et al, 2016).…”
Section: Could a Chimeric Condition Be Responsible For Unexpected Genmentioning
confidence: 99%