Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture VI 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-85729-338-1_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Technique for Evaluation of Interactive Evolutionary Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When testing the effects of user error (reported in [11]) it was shown that overall the levels of error do not have much effect until the error level reaches 7% (about 1 in 14). At this level, for a population of 16 individuals, we get over 1 error in each generation, and these errors can therefore be expected to affect the best individual once every 16 iterations.…”
Section: Handling Errorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When testing the effects of user error (reported in [11]) it was shown that overall the levels of error do not have much effect until the error level reaches 7% (about 1 in 14). At this level, for a population of 16 individuals, we get over 1 error in each generation, and these errors can therefore be expected to affect the best individual once every 16 iterations.…”
Section: Handling Errorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similar to the used idea in Shackelford and Corne (2004) and Tonella et al (2013), the human tacit assessment is simulated by creating a "target solution" which represents a solution that the DM would consider "ideal" or "gold standard". Such solution has the same structure of an individual and, consequently, comprises of a subset of the selected requirements to be implemented, respecting the budget and the interdependency constraints.…”
Section: Artificial Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%