2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2017.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A techno-economic assessment of membrane distillation for treatment of Marcellus shale produced water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, although the cost per cubic meter of inlet water decreases, the same cost expressed in terms of cost per cubic meter of permeate increases, changing from just over 23 US$ per cubic meter of water generated in the process to nearly 27 US$ per cubic meter. This trend agrees with works published by Elsayed, N et al (2015) and Tavakkoli et al (2017). Fig.…”
Section: Parametric Study Of the Effect Of Produced Water Salinitysupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, although the cost per cubic meter of inlet water decreases, the same cost expressed in terms of cost per cubic meter of permeate increases, changing from just over 23 US$ per cubic meter of water generated in the process to nearly 27 US$ per cubic meter. This trend agrees with works published by Elsayed, N et al (2015) and Tavakkoli et al (2017). Fig.…”
Section: Parametric Study Of the Effect Of Produced Water Salinitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Since high recycle ratios are needed to reach the outlet specified salinity and these streams must be reheated before entering the membrane stage again, the amount of thermal and pumping energy required increases dramatically. Similar findings were reported by Tavakkoli et al (2017), in whose study most of the operational cost was attributed to the thermal energy requirements.…”
Section: Fig 5 Optimal Solution Of the Multistage Membrane Distillasupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The average freshwater production by the proposed MD system was evaluated up to 40,759 L/day with a cost of $0.392/m 3 . The authors of [176] evaluated the economic feasibility of MD for wastewater treatment by performing a techno-economic assessment (TEA) for a hypothetical 0.5 million gallons per day (MGD) direct contact MD (DCMD) which concentrates produced water from 10% (100,000 mg/L) TDS to 30% salinity. Sensitivity analysis showed that the TDS level of the feed and the price of thermal energy significantly affect the total cost of treating produced water.…”
Section: Economic Analysis Of MD Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The economic analysis was conducted by carrying out the steady-state mass and energy balances using PROII simulation software was updated by calculating fixed capital cost by MD performance (water flux) based on reference papers (Khayet et. al., 2011, Tavakkoli et. al., 2017.…”
Section: Process Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%