A technological innovation system approach to analysis knowledge spillover, the case of rotary-wing technology in Iran

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to contribute to the debate of knowledge spillover by presenting a new application for the approach of the technological innovation system (TIS). Design/methodology/approach Based on the evolutionary economics of the TIS approach, a new framework for knowledge spillover is built and applied to a case. To collect data in studying the case, a mix of quantitative–qualitative methods are used. Findings TIS approach can help build a framework to analyze knowledge spillover from defense to the civil sector. This framework shows the direct relationship between the functional dynamics of the system and the spillover mechanism.. Research limitations/implications Sharing the same weakness as TIS, the suggested framework does not pay attention to the contextual factors. Practical implications This framework is an analytical tool. It could be used for educational and research purposes, but it has limited power to devise policy guidelines. Social implications This framework is an analytical tool. It could be used for educational and research purposes. But it has limited power to devise policy guidelines. Originality/value The paper deviates from the conventional literature of knowledge spillover which uses national level of system analysis. Based on TIS, it adds a new perspective to the literature which had suffered from a limited value of generalizability.

Editorial

“…The journal explores key research questions like how science and technology can contribute to boost competitiveness of countries and regions, to a greener planet and towards more sustainable futures for people. Companies and economies must benefit from world-class research and cutting-edge innovation, increase transnational collaborations in science and technology, reinforce their leadership and entrepreneurship positions and benefit from strategic digital and enabling technologies in different sectors, like digital health (Chui et al , 2017; European Commission, 2021; Miremadi and Baharloo, 2020; Radicic, 2020; Ullah et al , 2020).…”