2018
DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2018.1555717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A telemetry study to discriminate between home range and territory size in Tawny Owls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One novel finding, however, is that we detected a quadratic effect, indicating that both extensive forest areas and small patches of forest negatively affected tawny owl abundance (for similar results, see also [40]), this being different to results obtained in another work [41]. It seems, therefore, that the species may benefit from using woodland areas with some degree of forest fragmentation, with the non-forested areas comprising small patches of open habitats such as grasslands, meadows, or pastures [42]. Urbanization showed a forest-dependent effect in addition to its overall negative effect.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One novel finding, however, is that we detected a quadratic effect, indicating that both extensive forest areas and small patches of forest negatively affected tawny owl abundance (for similar results, see also [40]), this being different to results obtained in another work [41]. It seems, therefore, that the species may benefit from using woodland areas with some degree of forest fragmentation, with the non-forested areas comprising small patches of open habitats such as grasslands, meadows, or pastures [42]. Urbanization showed a forest-dependent effect in addition to its overall negative effect.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…This is probably due to the permanent food supplies that urban environments provide [43], as well as the availability of suitable new nesting and roosting sites [44]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that home range size decreases at the intermediate level of forested area [42], with higher densities being found in urban areas mixed with patchily distributed forests than in purely forested areas [20,45], but always depending on the proportion of suitable habitats available [19]. Regarding the aggregation level of urban patches (CLU), something similar happens in areas of low urbanization (<10%), where aggregation level has a slight, nearly constant, effect on tawny owl abundance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the cells that were not sampled were excluded due to their inaccessibility (i.e., private land, steep slopes, etc.). The territory of a Tawny Owl pair is in fact bigger than the scale of our survey unit (31.11ha in urban areas) (Burgos & Zuberogoitia, 2018), so the survey data obtained here was only useful for studying its presence-absence, not to calculate abundance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…500 m to 1596 m a.s.l. Parent rock consists predominantly of dolomites, limestones and marly limestones (Biely et al 2002). The relief of the mountain range is quite rugged, with a large elevational range.…”
Section: S T U D Y a R E Amentioning
confidence: 99%