1998
DOI: 10.1176/ps.49.1.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Ten-Year Review of the Validity and Clinical Utility of Depression Screening

Abstract: Fifty-nine studies met criteria for review. Validation studies were the most frequent type (39 studies) and were subclassified according to population, type of comparison, and analytical method. These studies documented the validity of screening instruments compared with formal criteria and demonstrated consistently better performance for systematic approaches compared with clinical impressions. Thirteen studies were reviews; those reviewing evidence for effectiveness disagreed in their conclusions. Only seven… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are conflicting data regarding the effectiveness of routine screening for depression in primary care populations. Schade et al (52) reported that no studies "show that screening leads to measurable benefit." In addition, several studies failed to demonstrate improved outcomes as a result of screening for depression (51,52); however, Coyne et al (53) argued that screening is effective because it identifies depressed patients whose disorder may otherwise go undetected by health providers.…”
Section: Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are conflicting data regarding the effectiveness of routine screening for depression in primary care populations. Schade et al (52) reported that no studies "show that screening leads to measurable benefit." In addition, several studies failed to demonstrate improved outcomes as a result of screening for depression (51,52); however, Coyne et al (53) argued that screening is effective because it identifies depressed patients whose disorder may otherwise go undetected by health providers.…”
Section: Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study the occurrence of depression was based solely on participants' responses to a single question about feeling depressed. However, in a review, Schade et al (36) found that brief instruments perform about as well as longer questionnaires for identifying depression in the general population, and the value of single-item depression screening has previously been established (37,38). In the age-adjusted model depression was associated with incident diabetes in men, but in the multivariate models it was no longer statistically significant, reflecting a confounding effect of other variables included.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Efforts to increase such screening in primary care and outpatient settings have a long history. 5,6 In contrast, little attention has been paid to the emergency department (ED), despite that EDs form a critical component of the nation's health care system with approximately 110 million ED visits occurring in 2002. 7 In 2000, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine's Public Health and Education Task Force concluded that the evidence was not sufficient to recommend for or against depression screening in the ED and encouraged more work to be done in this area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%