1978
DOI: 10.1107/s0567739478001692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test for rigid-body vibrations based on a generalization of Hirshfeld's `rigid-bond' postulate

Abstract: The maximum of E is obtained if all 0.~, are -1. The minimum of E is obtained if all 0.k are + 1, which agrees with the result of Kabsch (1976).It has also been shown in Kabsch (1976) that S + L must be positive definite at the minimum of E. Hence, from (2) the determinants of the two matrices, U and R, must have the same signs.In the case that det(R) > 0, the orthogonal matrix U corresponding to the minimum of E will be a proper rotation. In the case that det(FI) < 0, an improper rotation will be obtained at … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The generalization of Hirshfeld's (1976) rigid-bond test proposed by Rosenfield, Trueblood & Dunitz (1978) was applied to the vibration parameters to test their self-consistency; the average difference in the mean-square vibration amplitude for pairs of bonded atoms was 0.0030 A 2, comparable to the average e.s.d, expected for this difference (calculated from the average e.s.d, of the U°), 0.0027/~2. Furthermore, the differences in mean-square vibration amplitudes for non-bonded pairs of atoms within each ring were the same as those for bonded pairs of atoms, even in the ring (ring 2, Table 5) with the largest libration amplitude, a finding consistent with the expected rigidity of an aromatic ring.…”
Section: Distances (]~) Angles (O) and Torsion Anglesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1). The generalization of Hirshfeld's (1976) rigid-bond test proposed by Rosenfield, Trueblood & Dunitz (1978) was applied to the vibration parameters to test their self-consistency; the average difference in the mean-square vibration amplitude for pairs of bonded atoms was 0.0030 A 2, comparable to the average e.s.d, expected for this difference (calculated from the average e.s.d, of the U°), 0.0027/~2. Furthermore, the differences in mean-square vibration amplitudes for non-bonded pairs of atoms within each ring were the same as those for bonded pairs of atoms, even in the ring (ring 2, Table 5) with the largest libration amplitude, a finding consistent with the expected rigidity of an aromatic ring.…”
Section: Distances (]~) Angles (O) and Torsion Anglesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Neither the Na-O nor the La-O polyhedron conformed to rigid-body behavior, but the sulfate ion did; the average magnitude of the differences in the meansquare displacement amplitudes along the interatomic vectors for the ten unique atom pairs of the sulfate ion was 15 (16) x 10 -4 A 2. The Hirshfeld (1976) rigid-bond test, extended as described by Rosenfield, Trueblood & Dunitz (1978), is satisfied and the corrected S--O bond lengths are given in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach using re®ned individual ADPs is to use the rigid-body criterion (Rosen®eld et al, 1978) in which a D matrix is built up between all pairs of atoms, with elements equal to the difference in the projected U values along the interatomic vector. Pairs of atoms belonging to the same quasi-rigid group should have a D value close to zero.…”
Section: Choice Of Rigid Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%