1991
DOI: 10.2307/2524698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Test of an Efficiency Model of Grievance Activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They find support for the theory in that employees receiving a wage premium were more likely to use formal grievance systems rather than shirking or absenteeism to address conflicts. Cappelli and Chauvin (1991b) find further support for efficiency wages in a comparison of disciplinary dismissals and wages rates. They find that higher wage rates are associated with fewer disciplinary dismissals.…”
Section: Efficiency Wagesmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…They find support for the theory in that employees receiving a wage premium were more likely to use formal grievance systems rather than shirking or absenteeism to address conflicts. Cappelli and Chauvin (1991b) find further support for efficiency wages in a comparison of disciplinary dismissals and wages rates. They find that higher wage rates are associated with fewer disciplinary dismissals.…”
Section: Efficiency Wagesmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Past research on these concepts of commitment suggests that when employees have no viable or desirable alternative outside their organization, or when the cost of exit far out-weighs the benefits of staying, employees are less likely to leave the organization (Kidron, 1978;Cappelli & Chauvin, 1991;Chen & Francisco, 2000). Hirschman (1970:77) argues that calculative commitment "makes exit less likely".…”
Section: Organizational Commitment and Evlnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, scholars that used filing grievances as a proxy for voice found that use of voice has negative consequences on those that use it (Oslon-Buchanan, 1996;Cappelli & Chauvin, 1991;Boroff & Lewin, 1997) because "employers tend to exercise retribution against grievance filers" ( Lewin & Peterson, 1999: 554) and as a result individuals are unlikely to voice their concerns (Boroff & Lewin 1977: 60) and tend to stay quiet and suffer in silence when dissatisfied with their organization.…”
Section: H1b: Attitudinal Commitment Is Negatively Associated With Exitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theories of employee turnover (i.e., quitting), which represents an alternate form of withdrawal, offer the similar conceptual rationale that when employment alternatives are scarce, employees may be less likely to quit even when dissatisfied, and there is at least some empirical support for the hypothesis that unemployment moderates satisfaction-turnover relationships (Trevor, 2001). The more general notion that labor market conditions alter the withdrawal mechanisms chosen by dissatisfied employees has received support in the context of employee grievance filing (e.g., Bacharach & Bamberger, 2004;Cappelli & Chauvin, 1991). …”
Section: Hypothesis 2 Unit-level Organizational Commitment Is Negatimentioning
confidence: 99%