1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0082-0784(96)80223-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test of an engineering model of premixed turbulent combustion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The premixed combustion model equation in terms of the progress variable and the rst results of combustion numerical simulations was presented in 5]. References 6]-10] contain mainly results of this combustion model validation using di erent standard experimental data in spherical bombs with arti cial turbulisation [5][6][7][8], in a channel at high velocity combustion 9] and in industrial burners 10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The premixed combustion model equation in terms of the progress variable and the rst results of combustion numerical simulations was presented in 5]. References 6]-10] contain mainly results of this combustion model validation using di erent standard experimental data in spherical bombs with arti cial turbulisation [5][6][7][8], in a channel at high velocity combustion 9] and in industrial burners 10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curves have been obtained using (9). and validated by the present author [35][36][37]. As reviewed elsewhere [3,27], the model is successfully used by a number of different groups to simulate various turbulent flames.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As pointed out elsewhere [39], the model tested by Bray et al [21] differed substantially from the model developed and validated by Zimont and Lipatnikov [35][36][37]. In particular, the latter model provides a joint closure of the sum of the transport and reaction terms in the following well-known [13] balance equation:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…where A = 0.52 is the model constant, u ′ is the root-mean-square velocity, α is the unburnt thermal diffusivity, l t is the turbulence length scale, τ t = l t /u [27], [72] did not incorporate chemical kinetics but assumed that the influence of chemistry on a turbulent premixed flame may be qualitatively approximated the correct laminar flame speed, which depends on the chemistry. However, in the present study a simple combination of TFC and the β-PDF approach with the equilibrium chemistry assumption [64], as implemented in the CFD code Ansys Fluent (AF), was used for taking into account chemical effects.…”
Section: Turbulent Flame Closure (Tfc) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%