1996
DOI: 10.1080/87565649609540647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test of conditioned blocking and its development in childhood and adolescence: Relationship to personality and monoamine metabolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study by Oades et al, (1996) compared conditioned blocking (CB) across 4 age groups and found that CB was present throughout ages 10 to 22 years, but was weaker in younger children, up to 12 years of age. This lack of human studies does not reflect absence of interest (Casey et al, 2009; Pattwell et al, 2011; Soliman et al, 2010).…”
Section: Conditioning Across Adolescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study by Oades et al, (1996) compared conditioned blocking (CB) across 4 age groups and found that CB was present throughout ages 10 to 22 years, but was weaker in younger children, up to 12 years of age. This lack of human studies does not reflect absence of interest (Casey et al, 2009; Pattwell et al, 2011; Soliman et al, 2010).…”
Section: Conditioning Across Adolescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is one conclusion from developmental studies of trace conditioning [128], a form of associative learning that requires hippocampal function in animals. Both latent inhibition (LI) and conditioned blocking (CB) tests of learned inattention do not achieve mature levels in normal children until the second decade [48,71]. LI is a test of the ability to 'unlearn' that a stimulus has no consequence and acquire an appropriate response to a new contingency.…”
Section: Lateralization and Temporal Lobe Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%