“…Since 1994, a regular sampling program has been carried out with, at average, biweekly sampling, that led to (1) detailed study of species composition and succession pattern of phytoplankton (Krienitz & Scheffler, 1994, Padisák et al, 1998, (2) discovery of a freshwater deep chlorophyll maximum formed by the picocyanobacterium Cyanobium (Gervais et al, 1997;Padisák et al, 1997), (3) description of population dynamics of phycogeographically restricted unicellular diatoms (Cyclotella tripartita and Stephanocostis chantaicus -Scheffler & Padisák, 1997, Scheffler & Padisák, 2000, (4) description of a new species of Eustigmatophyta (Pseudotetraedriella kamillae; Hegewald et al, 2007), and (5) by now provided a data bank that is suitable for analyses of long-term trends of phytoplankton changes (Padisák et al, 2010a, b). As the grazer food chain in the lake is rather weak (Mehner et al, 2008), microbial loop involving a number of mixo-and heterotrophic protists, is of prior importance especially in the winter isothermal period and during the clear water phase. However, due to the limitations of the inverted microscope method, identification of these flagellates is confused and incomplete.…”