2013
DOI: 10.1080/12538078.2013.773462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test of four candidate barcoding markers for the identification of geographically widespreadChimaphilaspecies (Pyroleae, Ericaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, we support the use of the ITS marker as a supplementary barcode in plants, while the performance of ITS should be evaluated in extensive trials in different plant groups (Liu et al, 2013; Liu J. et al, 2014; Wirta et al, 2016). The pragmatic solution to a complex trade-off between universality, sequence quality, discrimination, and cost, is the combination of T+I (90.5% species resolution), the most efficient and economical marker among single or combined DNA barcodes when identifying tree species in Aceraceae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, we support the use of the ITS marker as a supplementary barcode in plants, while the performance of ITS should be evaluated in extensive trials in different plant groups (Liu et al, 2013; Liu J. et al, 2014; Wirta et al, 2016). The pragmatic solution to a complex trade-off between universality, sequence quality, discrimination, and cost, is the combination of T+I (90.5% species resolution), the most efficient and economical marker among single or combined DNA barcodes when identifying tree species in Aceraceae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…With the development of molecular biology, the rise of DNA barcoding is expected to mitigate this dilemma, at least in part. DNA barcoding is one method that uses standard molecular techniques to achieve rapid and accurate species identification by a short DNA sequence (Hebert et al, 2003; Hebert and Gregory, 2005; Liu et al, 2013; Krawczyk et al, 2014). This method to remedy the limitations of a traditional morphology-based identification system will allow for more rapid progress in traditional taxonomic work (Kress et al, 2005; Liu J. et al, 2014; Nigro et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panax ginseng C.A.Mey. [ 29 30 ], Dendrobium Species[ 25 26 31 ], Euphorbia pekinensis [ 32 ], Bupleurum species[ 33 ], Chimaphila species[ 34 ] and Gentianopsis paludosa (Hook. f.) Ma[ 24 ] are all successful examples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%