This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version.
Permanent repository link:http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/5124/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1080/87565641.2014.997933 Copyright and reuse: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to.
AbstractThe current study assessed a comprehensive range of executive functions (EFs) in children with poor motor skills, comparing profiles of children with a diagnosis of developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and those identified with motor difficulties (MD). Children in both groups performed more poorly than typically-developing controls on (Geuze, 2005). The DLPFC is also closely linked to the cerebellum, a central structure in motor control, suggesting that motor impairments could have concomitant effects on cognitive functioning (Diamond, 2000). This relationship between motor and cognitive functioning is the focus of the present study.One area of cognitive functioning that may be affected in DCD, with particular implications for academic achievement, is that of 'executive functioning' (EF; Best, Miller, & Naglieri, 2011;St Clair-Thompson & Gathercole, 2006). This term covers a range of highlevel abilities, including planning, switching between tasks, inhibiting responses and storing information in memory while processing another task (Henry & Bettenay, 2010;Hill, 2004 & Howerter, 2000), the present study also assesses two further aspects of EF, planning and fluency, which have traditionally been studied in research with frontal lobe patients and those with other neurodevelopmental disorders (Pennington & Ozonoff, 1996).The current paper provides a detailed picture of the strengths and weaknesses of EF in children with DCD.Previous research investigating EF in DCD has reported mixed results. In measures of response inhibition, which require participants to either respond or inhibit their responses depending on the stimulus presented, children with a diagnosis of DCD make a similar number of errors to TD controls (e.g., Pratt, Leonard, Adeyinka, & Hill, 2014;Querne et al., 2008). However, when comparing button presses that were either congruent or incongruent with a visually-presented target, Mandich, Buckolz, and Polatajko (2002) reported that differences in errors between these two conditions were greater for those with DCD compared to TD controls. In tests of switching (e.g., "press button 'a' when you see stimulus Several methodological and interpretational difficulties arising from previous research into EF in DCD were addressed in the current study. One key issue is that many EF tasks require a motor response (such as pressing a button) or complex visuospatial processing, both of which may cause individuals with DCD to perform poorly due to impairments in these (...