A Test of the Bruhn and Parcel Model of Health Promotion

Chiu, Hui-Ju

doi:10.1097/01.jnr.0000387540.83630.38

Cited by 6 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Reliability coefficients on the diabetes-specific subscale are reported to be .90 to .92 (Grossman et al, 1987). Chui (2005) more recently reported a Cronbach's alpha on this subscale to be .88.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A New Self-Report Measure of Self-Management of Type 1 Diabetes for Adolescents

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The development of instruments to measure self-management in youth with type 1 diabetes has not kept up with current understanding of the concept. Objective To report the development and testing of a new self-report measure to assess self-management of type 1 diabetes in adolescence (SMOD-A). Methods Following a qualitative study, items were identified and reviewed by experts for content validity. A total of 515 adolescents, 13 to 21 years old, participated in a field study by completing the SMOD-A (either once or twice) and additional measures of diabetes related self-efficacy (SEDS), quality of life (DQOL), self-management (DSMP), and adherence (SCI). Data were collected also on metabolic control (HbA1c). Results The content validity of the scale (CVI) was .93. Exploratory alpha factor analyses revealed five subscales: Collaboration with Parents, Diabetes Care Activities, Diabetes Problem-Solving, Diabetes Communication, and Goals (α = .71 to .85). The stability of the SMOD-A ranged from .60 to .88 at 2 weeks (test-retest) to .59 to .85 at 3 months. Correlations of SMOD-A subscales with SEDS-Diabetes; DQOL satisfaction, impact, and worry; DSMP; and SCI were generally significant and in the expected direction. Collaboration with Parents and HbA1c values were related significantly and positively (r =.11); all other SMOD-A subscales were related significantly and negatively to HbA1c (r = −.10 to −.26), demonstrating that better self-management is associated somewhat with better metabolic control and supporting construct validity of the new measure. Discussion The SMOD-A has been found to be a reliable, stable, and valid measure of self-management of type 1 diabetes in adolescence.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A New Self-Report Measure of Self-Management of Type 1 Diabetes for Adolescents

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Respondents rate their degree of confidence on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 ("very sure I cannot") to 6 ("very sure I can") and possible scores range from 0 -96. Reliability coefficients were 0.88 -0.92 Chui, 2005).…”

Section: Knowledge and Beliefsmentioning

confidence: 95%

Testing Components of a Self-Management Theory in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Verchota

Sawin

2016

Nursing Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Regarding additional reports on reliability and validity in addition to original articles, Drotar and Levers (1994) reported internal consistency ranging from an alpha of .83 to .92 on DFRQ. Chiu (2005) reported reliabilities for the DFBS total scale, reinforcement, modeling, and interaction patterns subscales as . 74, .85, .73, and .73, respectively.…”

Section: Psychometric Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Diabetes Mellitus–Specific Family Assessment Instruments

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Family dynamics and attributes are increasingly recognized as affecting management of diabetes mellitus (DM); however, little research has been done on the validity and usefulness of family assessment instruments (FAIs). This article reviewed the literature that employs DM-specific FAIs and evaluates whether the instruments comprehensively captured family attributes/processes and were robust enough to be useful in understanding the relationship between family attributes/issues and DM-related health care. Studies using eight instruments were identified through a search of literature published from 1982 to 2010 and were analyzed with criteria derived from the measurement and family literatures. The findings of this study revealed that DM-specific FAIs yield useful data about family-related phenomenon; however, some domains of DM-specific care, such as family dynamics/functioning, were not overtly measured. Suggestions for improving DM-specific FAIs are provided and a rationale for why DM-specific and non-DM-specific FAIs is needed to fully measure family issues related to family dynamics/attributes on DM patient care.

show abstract

A Test of the Bruhn and Parcel Model of Health Promotion

Cited by 6 publications

References 30 publications

A New Self-Report Measure of Self-Management of Type 1 Diabetes for Adolescents

A New Self-Report Measure of Self-Management of Type 1 Diabetes for Adolescents

Testing Components of a Self-Management Theory in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

A Review of Diabetes Mellitus–Specific Family Assessment Instruments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About