1995
DOI: 10.1016/0146-6380(95)00069-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A test of the parallel reaction model using kinetic measurements on hydrous pyrolysis residues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Above all, the w parameter presents a correlation with the mean activation energy as high as 0.72. To de-correlate the parameters, it was tried to fit simultaneously sets of data taken at different heating rates [27,28]. In the regression code, a function, such as that reported in Equation (6), was created for each set of data, fixing the heating rate to the proper value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above all, the w parameter presents a correlation with the mean activation energy as high as 0.72. To de-correlate the parameters, it was tried to fit simultaneously sets of data taken at different heating rates [27,28]. In the regression code, a function, such as that reported in Equation (6), was created for each set of data, fixing the heating rate to the proper value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When conducted under controlled timetemperature conditions at different heating rates, measured hydrocarbon formation rate versus temperature curves provide reliable input data for the calculation of kinetic parameters which, in turn, allow to extrapolate from laboratory to geological heating rates which are ten orders of magnitude lower (Hanaba, Jüntgen & Peters, 1968;Philippi, 1965;Tissot & Espitalie, 1975). The reliability of the resulting predictions is directly related to the quality of the laboratory work (Burnham, Braun, & Gregg, 1987;Burnham, Schmidt, & Braun, 1995;, 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference suggests that ODP Mound fluids have attained higher levels of thermal stress. The degradation of straight chain hydrocarbons that constitute petroleum is generally viewed as a kinetically controlled process, where time and temperature are interchangeable variables ( BRAUN and ROTHMAN, 1975;BURNHAM et al, 1995;HUNT, 1996;TISSOT and WELTE, 1984;WAPLES, 1984). Thus, higher C 1 /(C 2 +C 3 ) ratios at the ODP Mound relative to Dead Dog indicate a more mature hydrocarbon suite that, in turn, reflects higher subsurface temperatures and/or longer subsurface residence times for circulating fluids.…”
Section: Kinetic Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%