A test of the quasi-circumplex structure of human values

Perrinjaquet, A.; Furrer, Olivier; Usunier, Jean‐Claude; Cestre, Ghislaine; Valette‐Florence, Pierre

doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.10.006

Cited by 56 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 81 publications

(164 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This taxonomy of values, which is called the Schwartz's value system (SVS) (Perrinjaquet, Furrer, Usunier, Cestre, & Valette-Florence, 2007), was commonly represented by Schwartz and his colleagues as a two dimensional, circular structure representing a continuum of values (Figure 1). The position of human values in Figure 1 shows values' degree of proximity or disconformity between them (Schwartz, 1992(Schwartz, , 1994.…”

Section: Human Values and Schwartz's Value Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, this model has also been criticized for the psychometric scale and collinearity issues observed between the values (Olver & Mooradian, 2003;Thøgersen & Ölander, 2002). Other scholars have argued that the empirical findings using the human values framework fail to provide convincing arguments for Schwartz's SVS structure (Perrinjaquet et al, 2007).…”

Section: Human Values and Schwartz's Value Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Wang and Juslin (2012) Concerns related to the concept of CSR grow as different dimensions are added to it, leading to a lack of consensus about findings; such concerns occupy an important place in the literature (Baden, Harwood, & Woodward, 2009;Fernando, 2010;Fernando & Sim, 2011;Ibrahim et al, 2006;Perrinjaquet et al, 2007;Pomering & Johnson, 2009). Business leaders have also manifested different views about the concept of CSR (Sprinkle & Mainess, 2010).…”

Section: Corporate Social Responsibility and The Triple Bottom Linementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Relation Between Background Variables, Values and Corporate Social Responsibility

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Consumer perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR) can be directly influenced by individual value structures. This research aims to provide new knowledge regarding the relationship between basic human values and the public's perception of CSR. It focuses on the values of higher education students and their views regarding a particular corporate social initiative. The study reveals that social, educational, and economic circumstances influence human values. Those values in turn influence why different students perceive CSR differently. These findings are relevant to companies as they provide a more detailed understanding of why certain consumer groups perceive certain CSR initiatives the way that they do. They also suggest that universities should increase their awareness of the importance of integrating human values and CSR in the curricula of future business managers and social leaders. KEYWORDS RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas | FGV/EAESP

show abstract

Section: Human Values and Schwartz's Value Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Human Values and Schwartz's Value Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Corporate Social Responsibility and The Triple Bottom Linementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Relation Between Background Variables, Values and Corporate Social Responsibility

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The alphas and CR greater than or equal to .70, along with factor loadings that exceed .50, suggest acceptable reliability and convergent validity (Nunnally and Bernstein, 1994). We tested seven-factor models rather than the seven dimensions separately so that we could investigate the discriminant validity of the seven response strategies simultaneously (Perrinjaquet et al, 2007). We employed maximum likelihood estimation procedures, because the data do not strongly violate multivariate normality assumptions (McDonald and Ho, 2002).…”

Section: Construct Validity and Cross-cultural Invariance Of The Respmentioning

confidence: 99%

Response strategies in an international strategic alliance experimental context: Cross-country differences

Tjemkes¹,

Furrer

Adolfs³

et al. 2012

Journal of International Management

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International strategic alliances have grown increasingly popular in recent decades, yet their failure rate is extremely high. Poor management of adverse situations contributes significantly to such high failure rates. Moreover, the international environments in which international strategic alliances operate exacerbate the adverse situations and make their management more critical.However, extant research does not specify how people from different national cultures respond to these adverse situations. In order to better understand cross-national differences, this study investigates future managers' preferences for specific response strategies in an international strategic alliance experimental context. Using a scenario-based experiment with 1,379 business students in five countries-Japan, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United Kingdom-the authors assess whether preferences for seven response strategies-exit, opportunism, aggressive voice, creative voice, considerate voice, patience, and neglect-vary across countries. The results indicate that national culture, both directly and interactively through relationship-level exchange variables that characterize the adversity of the situation, influences response strategy preference. This study advances literature on response strategies by explaining that when faced with the same adverse situation, future managers from different countries likely prefer different response strategies, depending on which response strategies they believe are most adequate in their cultural environment.

show abstract

“…Conservation includes tradition which is the continuity of customs and ideas, conformity which is restraining actions within group norms, and security which is maintaining social stability. Strong empirical support for Schwartz's conclusion has been provided by studies conducted in over 60 countries (Perrinjaquet et al, 2007). Fischer and Schwartz (2011) claim that value priorities show more agreement than disagreement across countries.…”

Section: One Of the Best-known Theories Describing Human Values Is Thmentioning

confidence: 99%

Human Values and Reaction to CSR Announcements: A Cross-National Comparison with Emphasis on U.S.–Global Differences

Pawlak

Mahesh

2014

IJMSBA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Studies have been conducted in five countries concerning the human values of management students, and their opinions about corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives. While the results suggest that CSR announcements have a significant influence on the opinion about company CSR initiatives, we observe a difference between students in the U.S. and students in other countries. The highest negative response to CSR announcements was in the group of self-transcendent students in the USA, and in the group of conservative students in Europe and Asia. On the basis of these studies' results, it is possible to say that there are differences in reactions to CSR announcements depending on cultural (local) circumstances and that companies should not employ direct communication concerning their CSR initiatives.

show abstract

A test of the quasi-circumplex structure of human values

Cited by 56 publications

References 81 publications

Relation Between Background Variables, Values and Corporate Social Responsibility

Relation Between Background Variables, Values and Corporate Social Responsibility

Response strategies in an international strategic alliance experimental context: Cross-country differences

Human Values and Reaction to CSR Announcements: A Cross-National Comparison with Emphasis on U.S.–Global Differences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About