2000
DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Test of the Relative Pricing Effects of Dividends and Earnings: Evidence from Simultaneous Announcements in Japan

Abstract: We study the pricing effects of dividend and earnings announcements by taking advantage of the unique setting in Japan where managers simultaneously announce the current year's dividends and earnings as well as forecasts of next year's dividends and earnings. Defining surprises as deviations from analysts' forecasts, we find that share price reactions are significantly affected by earnings surprises, especially management forecasts of next year's earnings. The information content of dividends is marginal and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
80
3
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
10
80
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficients of EP SERR are insignificant for all model specifications in both classifications. This result is contrary to findings in the literature (Leftwich and Zmijewski, 1994;Conroy, Eades and Harris, 2000) but supports the findings of Cheng, Fung and Leung who also document that dividend surprises exert a stronger pricing effect than simultaneous earnings announcements.…”
Section: Dividend Announcements Effects and Market Expectationscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The coefficients of EP SERR are insignificant for all model specifications in both classifications. This result is contrary to findings in the literature (Leftwich and Zmijewski, 1994;Conroy, Eades and Harris, 2000) but supports the findings of Cheng, Fung and Leung who also document that dividend surprises exert a stronger pricing effect than simultaneous earnings announcements.…”
Section: Dividend Announcements Effects and Market Expectationscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Тем не менее в ряде исследований утверждается, что не совсем корректно принимать изменение уровня дивидендных выплат как таковое в качестве прокси для неожиданной вели-чины дивиденда (см. : [Wooldridge, 1983;Bar-Yosef, Sarig, 1992;Conroy, Eades, Harris, 2000;Fuller, 2003;Andres et al, 2013;Amin et al, 2015] и др.). Они объясняют это тем, что ожидания игроков рынка от-носительно предстоящих дивидендов фор-мируются прогнозами аналитиков, а не уровнем ранее выплаченных дивидендов.…”
Section: от традиционной модели к модели дивидендного «сюрприза»: обзunclassified
“…Так, в статье [Conroy, Eades, Harris, 2000] авторы рассматрива-ют реакцию японского фондового рынка на одновременные объявления дивидендов и прибылей японскими компаниями. В ис-следование вошло 3890 объявлений за пе-риод с 1988 по 1993 г. Результаты эмпи-рического исследования указали на то, что в Японии инвесторы скорее реагируют на объявления об изменениях прибылей, не-жели на объявления дивидендов.…”
Section: от традиционной модели к модели дивидендного «сюрприза»: обзunclassified
“…The PEG ratio has been highly insignificant for impacting the earnings growth of both dividend paying or non-dividend paying companies the probability for non-dividend companies is 0.8384 and the probability for dividend paying companies is 0.7369 as shown in Table 7 and hasn't impacted company's earnings in the future [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Past Earnings Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%