Choices, Values, and Frames 2000
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511803475.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
93
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The materials used consisted of a questionnaire that included three sections. The first section consisted of an equivalent gain behavioral lottery task (Bateman et al, 1997). This consisted of two pages of options that asked participants to choose between a series of options consisting of a monetary amount and a box of chocolates, e.g., "We give you £0.60 or we give you a box of 8 chocolates."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The materials used consisted of a questionnaire that included three sections. The first section consisted of an equivalent gain behavioral lottery task (Bateman et al, 1997). This consisted of two pages of options that asked participants to choose between a series of options consisting of a monetary amount and a box of chocolates, e.g., "We give you £0.60 or we give you a box of 8 chocolates."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former producing estimates that are generally lower than the latter form of estimates. Differences may have arisen because of loss-aversion differences 4 and if loss aversion is treated as a bias then an equivalent gain task may be a more appropriate valuation technique (Bateman et al, 1997). Equivalent gain methods treat both the money and the good symmetrically as gains, effectively removing the influence of loss-aversion effects.…”
Section: Behavior Toward Gm Foodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The y-axis could represent an index like vulnerability, lives saved, or happiness, depending on what the policy question is that drives the research. Understanding tradeoffs or cost effectiveness does not require monetizing the benefits, which can be difficult and imprecise (see Kahneman et al 1993, Bateman et al 1997a.…”
Section: Economic Framework Ecosystem Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The property of invariance is not restricted to expected utility theories but also holds for various generalizations, (see e.g., Starmer, 2000). 3 A few examples of how framing influences a wide range of other economic decisions are Andreoni (1995), Bateman et al (1997), and Shafir, Diamond, and Tversky (1997), among many others. Bruine de Bruin (2010) and references therein discuss specific issues related to framing in a survey context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%